| Autor: |
Andreychenko, Kirill Arzamasov, Yuriy Vasilev, Anton Vladzymyrskyy, Olga Omelyanskaya, Igor Shulkin, Darya Kozikhina, Inna Goncharova, Pavel Gelezhe, Yury Kirpichev, Tatiana Bobrovskaya, Anna |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Healthcare; Volume 11; Issue 12; Pages: 1684 |
| ISSN: |
2227-9032 |
| DOI: |
10.3390/healthcare11121684 |
| Popis: |
An international reader study was conducted to gauge an average diagnostic accuracy of radiologists interpreting chest X-ray images, including those from fluorography and mammography, and establish requirements for stand-alone radiological artificial intelligence (AI) models. The retrospective studies in the datasets were labelled as containing or not containing target pathological findings based on a consensus of two experienced radiologists, and the results of a laboratory test and follow-up examination, where applicable. A total of 204 radiologists from 11 countries with various experience performed an assessment of the dataset with a 5-point Likert scale via a web platform. Eight commercial radiological AI models analyzed the same dataset. The AI AUROC was 0.87 (95% CI:0.83–0.9) versus 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.97) for radiologists. The sensitivity and specificity of AI versus radiologists were 0.71 (95% CI 0.64–0.78) versus 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.95) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96) versus 0.9 (95% CI 0.85–0.94) for AI. The overall diagnostic accuracy of radiologists was superior to AI for chest X-ray and mammography. However, the accuracy of AI was noninferior to the least experienced radiologists for mammography and fluorography, and to all radiologists for chest X-ray. Therefore, an AI-based first reading could be recommended to reduce the workload burden of radiologists for the most common radiological studies such as chest X-ray and mammography. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
