A preliminary study on reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia
| Jazyk: | japonština |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | 岡山県立大学保健福祉学部紀要 = BULLETIN OF FACULTY OF HEALTH AND WELFARE SCIENCE, OKAYAMA PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY. 29:89-94 |
| ISSN: | 1341-2531 |
| Popis: | 【目的】社会参加の指標として QOL の概念の自己信頼感が注目されている。本研究の目的は失語症者のコミュニケーションの自己信頼感尺度 Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia（CCRSA）日本語版の信頼性・妥当性と、下位項目の難易度・適合性の予備的検討であった。【方法】生活期の介護保険サービス利用の失語症者 13 名を対象とした。統計学的検討において内的整合性信頼性にクロンバックのα係数、再検査信頼性に ICC、併存的妥当性・判別的妥当性の判定に各種指標との相関係数、項目の難易度・適合度の判定に Rasch 分析を用いた。【結果】CCRSA の総計は高い信頼性・妥当性を示したが、3 項目は低い ICC とRasch 分析の値を示した。【考察】CCRSA の基本的な信頼性・妥当性が確認されたが、3 項目の再検査信頼性、難易度は不適切であり、今後の修正が必要と考える。 【Purpose】Self-confidence, a concept related to quality of life, has been attracting attention as an indicator of social participation. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA), a self-confidence scale for communication by people with aphasia (PWA), and to conduct a preliminary study of the difficulty level and suitability of the sub-items.【Methods】13 PWA using long-term care insurance services in the living period were included in the study. Cronbach's α coefficient was used for internal consistency reliability, ICC for retest reliability, correlation coefficients with various indices for comorbid and discriminant validity, and Rasch analysis for determining difficulty and goodness of fit in for items in the statistical examination.【Results】The total CCRSA score showed high reliability and validity, while the ICC and Rasch analysis values were low for 3 items.【Discussion】Although the reliability and validity of CCRSA were confirmed, there were some items with issues in retest reliability and difficulty, which we need to revise in the future. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|