'Equal pay for equal work' and the interpretation of article20 of the labor contract act
| Autor: | Michio, Tsuchida |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | japonština |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | 同志社法學 = The Doshisha Hogaku (The Doshisha law review). 69(7):2840-2783 |
| ISSN: | 0387-7612 |
| Popis: | 現在、労働契約法20条と、「働き方改革」の主要な立法政策課題である「同一労働同一賃金」の間の異同・関係性が重要な課題となっている。本論文は、最近の裁判例(メトロコマース事件・東京地判平成29・3・23)を素材に両ルールの関係性を探りつつ、20条の解釈に際して「同一労働同一賃金」がいかなる意義を有するかについて理論的に考察する。 Recently, it has become a significant legal issue how Japanese Labor Contracts Act article 20 concerning prohibition of unreasonable labor conditions by providing a fixed term can normatively be situated in relation with the principle of equal pay for equal work, which is regarded as major legislative policy subject of work-style reform being promoted by Japanese Government. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a legal study on the normative relationship between the article 20 and the principle and how the principle can be served as the interpreting of the article 20, by focusing on recent case, so-called "Metro Commerce case"(Tokyo District Court, judgement of March 23, 2017). 瀬川晃教授古稀記念論集 Dedicated to Professor Akira Segawa on his 70th birthday 第一部(I) Article |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|