Akıl Delilini Fıkıh Usulcülerinin Farklı Anlamlarda Kullanmaları Üstüne / On The Fact That The Methodologists of Muhammadan Jurisprudence Used Reason In Different Meanings
| Autor: | MACİT, Yüksel |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | turečtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Hikmet Yurdu Düşünce-Yorum Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi; Cilt 6, Sayı 12 (2013): Temmuz-Aralık 2013/2; 119-131 |
| ISSN: | 1308-6944 |
| Popis: | On The Fact That The Methodologists of Muhammadan Jurisprudence Used Reason In Different Meanings. All methodologists of Muhammadan jurisprudence accepted reason as evidence (or proof), but used ın different meanings. The most of scholars has accept it proof as a understanding, ınterpreting and distinguishing from general decision; some of them has approval it as a authority with opinion on ra’y. This study attempted to identify this different understandings with its documents Bütün fıkıh usulcüleri aklı delil olarak kabul etmişlerdir, ancak farklı anlamlarda kullanmışlardır. Çoğunluk onu nasları anlayıcı, tefsir ve tahsis edici manada delil olarak kabul ederken, bazısı onu rey ile hüküm verici yetkide görmüştür. Bu çalışma akıl delili ile ilgili bu farklı anlayışları belgeleriyle ortaya koymaya yöneliktir. Abstract On The Fact That The Methodologists of Muhammadan Jurisprudence Used Reason In Different Meanings. All methodologists of Muhammadan jurisprudence accepted reason as evidence (or proof), but used ın different meanings. The most of scholars has accept it proof as a understanding, ınterpreting and distinguishing from general decision; some of them has approval it as a authority with opinion on ra'y. This study attempted to identify this different understandings with its documents. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|