Risicopercepties van mannen met gelokaliseerde prostaatkanker
| Jazyk: | Dutch; Flemish |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology Prostatectomy/adverse effects Middle Aged Local/psychology Prostate-Specific Antigen Radiotherapy/adverse effects Multicenter Study Urinary Incontinence/etiology Neoplasm Recurrence Surveys and Questionnaires Watchful Waiting/methods Journal Article Health Status Indicators Humans Comparative Study Longitudinal Studies Prospective Studies Erectile Dysfunction/etiology Correlation of Data Attitude to Health Aged |
| Zdroj: | Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 162:D2522 |
| ISSN: | 0028-2162 |
| Popis: | OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of patients' perceptions of the risks associated with localised prostate cancer treatments (radical prostatectomy [RP], radiotherapy [RT], and active surveillance [AS]), and to identify correlates of misperceptions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used baseline data (questionnaires completed after treatment information was provided but before treatment) of 426 patients with newly diagnosed localised prostate cancer who participated (87% response rate) in a prospective, longitudinal, multicentre study. Patients' pretreatment perceptions of differences in adverse outcomes of treatments were compared to those based on the literature. We used univariate and multivariate linear regression to identify correlates of misperceptions. RESULTS: About two-thirds (68%, n = 211) of the patients did not understand that the risk of disease recurrence is comparable between RP and RT. More than half of the patients did not comprehend that RP patients are at greater risk of urinary incontinence (65%, n = 202) and erectile dysfunction (61%, n = 190), and less at risk of bowel problems (53%, n = 211) compared to RT patients. Many patients overestimated the risk of requiring definitive treatment following AS (45%, n = 157) and did not understand that mortality rates following AS, RP, and RT are comparable (80%, n = 333). Consulting a radiotherapist or a clinical nurse specialist was positively associated with, and emotional distress was negatively associated with, better understanding of the risks (P < 0.05), although effect sizes were small. CONCLUSION: Prior to choosing treatment, most patients with prostate cancer poorly understood the differences in treatment risks. Greater efforts should be made to better understand why these misperceptions occur and, most importantly, how they can be corrected. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|