Intrinsic values and the life framework of values:why we should go back to basics -comment to O'Connor and Kenter (2019)
| Autor: | Glenn Deliège, Stijn Neuteleers, Ullrich Melle |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Department of Environmental Sciences, RS-Research Line Innovation (part of LIRS program), RS-Research Line Innovation (part of LIRSS program) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Global and Planetary Change
Science & Technology Health (social science) Instrumental and intrinsic value Sociology and Political Science Ecology Computer science O'Connor Geography Planning and Development Environmental Sciences & Ecology Current account Management Monitoring Policy and Law Epistemology NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS medicine Science & Technology - Other Topics medicine.symptom Green & Sustainable Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Environmental Sciences Nature and Landscape Conservation Confusion |
| Zdroj: | Neuteleers, S L F, Deliège, G & Melle, U 2021, ' Intrinsic values and the life framework of values : why we should go back to basics-comment to O'Connor and Kenter (2019) ', Sustainability Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 313-316 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00825-7 Sustainability Science, 16(1), 313-316. SPRINGER JAPAN KK |
| ISSN: | 1862-4065 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11625-020-00825-7 |
| Popis: | The IPBES Framework aims to allow room for a plurality of values and recently proposed a move from `Ecosystem Services’ to `Nature’s Contributions to People’. O’Connor and Kenter (2019) argue that both approaches still disregard nature as an end in itself. Therefore, they propose a new conceptualisation of `intrinsic value’ and a new approach, labelled the `Life Framework of Values’. This work is highly relevant, but we argue that there are some fundamental conceptual problems with their current account, in particular with the conceptualisation of intrinsic value, relational value, and their category of `living as’. We argue that the changes made to the underlying framework of O’Neill add more confusion than clarification, that it is better to return to the original framework and to focus energy on making that framework applicable. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink