Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (6 AUC) versus paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (6 AUC) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multicenter randomized trial

Autor: Kosmidis, Paraskevas A., Mylonakis, N., Skarlos, Dimosthenis V., Samantas, E., Dimopoulos, M. A., Papadimitriou, C., Kalofonos, H. P., Pavlidis, Nicholas, Nikolaides, C., Papaconstantinou, C., Fountzilas, George
Přispěvatelé: Pavlidis, Nicholas [0000-0002-2195-9961], Kalofonos, H. P. [0000-0002-3286-778X]
Rok vydání: 2000
Předmět:
Male
Oncology
Dose-response relationship
Nsclc
medicine.medical_treatment
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Carboplatin
chemistry.chemical_compound
Lung neoplasms
Controlled clinical trial
Treatment outcome
Middle aged
Bone marrow depression
Priority journal
Hematology
Inoperable cancer
Prognosis
Chemotherapy regimen
Multicenter study
Clinical trial
Lung non small cell cancer
Paclitaxel
Randomized controlled trial
Female
Drug
Human
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Drug response
Major clinical study
Article
Advanced cancer
Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols
Internal medicine
Dose response
Neurotoxicity
medicine
Humans
Area under curve
Aged
Drug induced disease
Disease progression
Chemotherapy
Performance status
business.industry
Carcinoma
Non-small-cell lung
Drug administration schedule
Leukopenia
Survival analysis
Nervous system diseases
medicine.disease
Cancer survival
Cancer combination chemotherapy
Regimen
chemistry
Liver function
business
Controlled study
Zdroj: Annals of Oncology
ISSN: 0923-7534
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008389402580
Popis: Purpose: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has become a widely used regimen in NSCLC due to phase II reports of moderate toxicity, reasonable activity and easy outpatient administration. Purpose of our present prospective study was to evaluate the dose-response relationship of paclitaxel. Patients and methods: Since July 1996, 198 patients with non-operable NSCLC and measurable disease without previous chemotherapy entered the trial. Ninety nine patients (group A) were randomized to receive paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in three-hour infusion plus carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 every 3 weeks and 99 (group B) to receive the same regimen with paclitaxel increased to 225 mg/m2. Eligibility criteria included WHO performance status 0-2, documented inoperable stage IIIA and IIIB, IV, no brain metastasis, no prior chemotherapy and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients in both groups were well-matched with baseline disease characteristics. Results: In group A with 90 evaluable patients, the response rate was 25.6%(6 CR, 17 PR) whereas in group B with 88 evaluable patients, the response rate was 31.8% (3 CR, 25 PR), P = 0.733. Median time to progression favored the high-dose paclitaxel (4.3 vs. 6.4 months, P = 0.044). The median survival was 9.5 months for group A versus 11.4 months for group B (P = 0.16). The one-year survival was 37% for group A and 44% for group B (P = 0.35). The best prognostic factor for one-year survival was the response rate (P < 0.0001). With a relative dose intensity of paclitaxel 0.94 in both groups, neurotoxicity (P = 0.025) and leucopenia (P = 0.038) were more pronounced in group B patients. No toxic death was observed. Conclusions: Higher dose paclitaxel prolongs the median time to progression but causes more neurotoxicity and leucopenia. The better response rate, the longer overall and better one-year survival seen with the higher dose of paclitaxel are not statistically significant. 11 7 799 805
Databáze: OpenAIRE