Ideas and Perspectives: When ocean acidification experiments are not the same, repeatability is not tested

Autor: P. Williamson, H.-O. Pörtner, S. Widdicombe, J.-P. Gattuso
Přispěvatelé: University of East Anglia [Norwich] (UEA), Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Laboratoire d'océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de la Mer de Villefranche (IMEV), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Biogeosciences, Vol 18, Pp 1787-1792 (2021)
Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences, European Geosciences Union, 2021, 18 (5), pp.1787-1792. ⟨10.5194/bg-18-1787-2021⟩
ISSN: 1726-4189
1726-4170
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-1787-2021⟩
Popis: Can experimental studies on the behavioural impacts of ocean acidification be trusted? That question was raised in early 2020 when a high-profile paper failed to corroborate previously observed responses of coral reef fish to high CO2. New information on the methodologies used in the “replicated” studies now provides a plausible explanation: the experimental conditions were substantially different. High sensitivity to test conditions is characteristic of ocean acidification research; such response variability shows that effects are complex, interacting with many other factors. Open-minded assessment of all research results, both negative and positive, remains the best way to develop process-based understanding. As in other fields, replication studies in ocean acidification are most likely to contribute to scientific advancement when carried out in a spirit of collaboration rather than confrontation.
Databáze: OpenAIRE