Which is more important for cardiometabolic health

Autor: Simone J. S. Sep, Carla J.H. van der Kallen, Ronald M.A. Henry, Simone J. P. M. Eussen, Nicolaas C. Schaper, Martien C. J. M. van Dongen, Coen D.A. Stehouwer, Hans H.C.M. Savelberg, Miranda T. Schram, Pieter C. Dagnelie, Annemarie Koster, Jeroen H. P. M. van der Velde
Přispěvatelé: Nutrition and Movement Sciences, RS: NUTRIM - R1 - Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular health, RS: CARIM - R3.01 - Vascular complications of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome, RS: NUTRIM - R3 - Chronic inflammatory disease and wasting, Promovendi CD, Interne Geneeskunde, MUMC+: MA Endocrinologie (9), RS: CAPHRI - R2 - Creating Value-Based Health Care, RS: CARIM - R3.02 - Hypertension and target organ damage, MUMC+: HVC Pieken Maastricht Studie (9), MUMC+: MA Interne Geneeskunde (3), RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, Epidemiologie, Sociale Geneeskunde, RS: CAPHRI - R4 - Health Inequities and Societal Participation
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Blood Glucose
Male
Endocrinology
Diabetes and Metabolism

Physical fitness
Type 2 diabetes
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Logistic regression
Impaired glucose tolerance
0302 clinical medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
Accelerometry
030212 general & internal medicine
Prediabetes
METABOLIC SYNDROME
GENERAL-POPULATION
MEN
ASSOCIATION
Middle Aged
DISEASE RISK-FACTORS
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE
Female
Waist Circumference
hormones
hormone substitutes
and hormone antagonists

BEHAVIOR
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
endocrine system
Article
03 medical and health sciences
Internal medicine
Internal Medicine
medicine
Humans
Exercise
METAANALYSIS
Aged
business.industry
Physical activity
MORTALITY
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Sedentary behaviour
ADULTS
medicine.disease
Impaired fasting glucose
Endocrinology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2

The metabolic syndrome
Metabolic syndrome
Sedentary Behavior
business
Zdroj: Diabetologia
Diabetologia, 61(12), 2561-2569. Springer, Cham
ISSN: 1432-0428
0012-186X
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4719-7
Popis: Aims/hypotheses Our aim was to examine the independent and combined (cross-sectional) associations of sedentary time (ST), higher intensity physical activity (HPA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) with metabolic syndrome and diabetes status. Methods In 1933 adults (aged 40–75 years) ST and HPA (surrogate measure for moderate to vigorous physical activity) were measured with the activPAL3. CRF was assessed by submaximal cycle–ergometer testing. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines. Diabetes status (normal, prediabetes [i.e. impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose] or type 2 diabetes) was determined from OGTT. (Multinomial) logistic regression analyses were used to calculate likelihood for the metabolic syndrome, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes according to ST, HPA and CRF separately and combinations of ST–CRF and HPA–CRF. Results Higher ST, lower HPA and lower CRF were associated with greater odds for the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes independently of each other. Compared with individuals with high CRF and high HPA (CRFhigh–HPAhigh), odds for the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes were higher in groups with a lower CRF regardless of HPA. Individuals with low CRF and low HPA (CRFlow–HPAlow) had a particularly high odds for the metabolic syndrome (OR 5.73 [95% CI 3.84, 8.56]) and type 2 diabetes (OR 6.42 [95% CI 3.95, 10.45]). Similarly, compared with those with high CRF and low ST (CRFhigh–STlow), those with medium or low CRF had higher odds for the metabolic syndrome, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, irrespective of ST. In those with high CRF, high ST was associated with significantly high odds for the metabolic syndrome (OR 2.93 [95% CI 1.72, 4.99]) and type 2 diabetes (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.17, 4.17]). The highest odds for the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes were observed in individuals with low CRF and high ST (CRFlow–SThigh) (OR [95% CI]: the metabolic syndrome, 9.22 [5.74, 14.80]; type 2 diabetes, 8.38 [4.83, 14.55]). Conclusions/interpretation These data suggest that ST, HPA and CRF should all be targeted in order to optimally reduce the risk for the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-018-4719-7) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
Databáze: OpenAIRE