Usefulness of standardized uptake value normalized by individual CT-based lean body mass in application of PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST)
Autor: | Hamada Kazuo, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Atsushi Narita, Takashi Yamanaga, Susumu Shiomi, Yasuyoshi Watanabe, Yutaka Katayama |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Lymphoma Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Standardized uptake value Signal-To-Noise Ratio Body weight Body Mass Index 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Image Processing Computer-Assisted medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Response criteria Retrospective Studies Radiation medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Fdg uptake Biological Transport General Medicine Middle Aged Reference Standards Liver Positron emission tomography Positron-Emission Tomography 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Lean body mass Female Radiology Analysis of variance Tomography X-Ray Computed Nuclear medicine business Body mass index |
Zdroj: | Radiological Physics and Technology. 9:170-177 |
ISSN: | 1865-0341 1865-0333 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12194-016-0346-5 |
Popis: | Our aim in this study was to verify the usefulness of the standardized uptake value (SUV) normalized by individual CT-based lean body mass (LBMCT) in application of PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST).We retrospectively investigated 14 patients (4 male and 10 female) with malignant lymphoma who were undergoing chemotherapy. (18)F-FDG PET/CT examinations were performed before and after chemotherapy. The LBMCT was calculated by estimation of fat weight from CT data (from skull base to pelvis). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) and the Bland-Altman plot were used for comparison among body weight, LBMCT, and LBM derived from a predictive equation (LBMPE). Indices for FDG uptake in the liver were: SUV, SUV based on LBMPE (SULPE), and SUV based on LBMCT (SULCT). Overall differences between the uptake values were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. If the ANOVA showed significance, differences between uptake values were investigated further by use of the Tukey-Kramer test. The mean values of body weight, LBMPE, and LBMCT were: 55.4 ± 14.9 (39.0-112.0), 43.0 ± 10.5 (31.3-75.2), and 35.3 ± 9.8 (23.4-75.8) kg, respectively. There was a wide dispersion between LBMPE and LBMCT (differences, 7.6 ± 3.6 kg; 95 % CI, 6.42-8.85). LBMPE was higher than LBMCT in all the cases except in Case 11. The mean uptake values significantly differed among SUV, SULPE, and SULCT (F = 68.3, p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |