Brief Montreal-Toulouse Language Assessment Battery: adaptation and content validity
Autor: | Karina Carlesso Pagliarin, Tainá Rossato Benfica, Eduarda Pinheiro de Oliveira, Karin Zazo Ortiz, Raira Fernanda Altmann |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Psychometrics lcsh:BF1-990 Aphasiology Assessment computer.software_genre 030507 speech-language pathology & audiology 03 medical and health sciences Elderly 0302 clinical medicine Language assessment Aphasia medicine Content validity Adaptation (computer science) Language business.industry Research Psychological research Cognition lcsh:Psychology Artificial intelligence medicine.symptom 0305 other medical science business Psychology computer 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Natural language processing |
Zdroj: | Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020) Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.33 2020 Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS Psicologia, Reflexão e Crítica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS |
ISSN: | 1678-7153 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s41155-020-00157-6 |
Popis: | Background Evaluating patients in the acute phase of brain damage allows for the early detection of cognitive and linguistic impairments and the implementation of more effective interventions. However, few cross-cultural instruments are available for the bedside assessment of language abilities. The aim of this study was to develop a brief assessment instrument and evaluate its content validity. Methods Stimuli for the new assessment instrument were selected from the M1-Alpha and MTL-BR batteries (Stage 1). Sixty-five images were redesigned and analyzed by non-expert judges (Stage 2). This was followed by the analysis of expert judges (Stage 3), where nine speech pathologists with doctoral training and experience in aphasiology and/or linguistics evaluated the images, words, nonwords, and phrases for inclusion in the instrument. Two pilot studies (Stage 4) were then conducted in order to identify any remaining errors in the instrument and scoring instructions. Results Sixty of the 65 figures examined by the judges achieved inter-rater agreement rates of at least 80%. Modifications were suggested to 22 images, which were therefore reanalyzed by the judges, who reached high levels of inter-rater agreement (AC1 = 0.98 [CI = 0.96–1]). New types of stimuli such as nonwords and irregular words were also inserted in the Brief Battery and favorably evaluated by the expert judges. Optional tasks were also developed for specific diagnostic situations. After the correction of errors detected in Stage 4, the final version of the instrument was obtained. Conclusion This study confirmed the content validity of the Brief MTL-BR Battery. The method used in this investigation was effective and can be used in future studies to develop brief instruments based on preexisting assessment batteries. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |