Prediction of unsuccessful endometrial ablation: random forest vs logistic regression
Autor: | Malou E. Gelderblom, Tanja Gijsen, Liesbet Lagaert, Saskia Houterman, Benedictus C. Schoot, Kelly Yvonne Roger Stevens, T.H.G.F. Bakkes |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Signal Processing Systems, Biomedical Diagnostics Lab, Electrical Engineering |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
SELECTION
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment MENORRHAGIA Logistic regression Menstruation PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS Surgical oncology Machine learning Medicine and Health Sciences medicine Endometrial ablation Hysterectomy medicine.diagnostic_test Obstetrics business.industry SUCCESS PAIN Obstetrics and Gynecology Interventional radiology Retrospective cohort study SUBSEQUENT Random forest THERMAL BALLOON ABLATION HYSTERECTOMY Surgery business |
Zdroj: | Gynecological Surgery, 18(1):18. Springer GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY |
ISSN: | 1613-2084 1613-2076 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s10397-021-01097-4 |
Popis: | Background Five percent of pre-menopausal women experience abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial ablation (EA) is one of the treatment options for this common problem. However, this technique shows a decrease in patient satisfaction and treatment efficacy on the long term. Study objective To develop a prediction model to predict surgical re-intervention (for example re-ablation or hysterectomy) within 2 years after endometrial ablation (EA) by using machine learning (ML). The performance of the developed prediction model was compared with a previously published multivariate logistic regression model (LR). Design This retrospective cohort study, with a minimal follow-up time of 2 years, included 446 pre-menopausal women (18+) that underwent an EA for complaints of heavy menstrual bleeding. The performance of the ML and the LR model was compared using the area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results We found out that the ML model (AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.56–0.74)) is not superior compared to the LR model (AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.64–0.78)) in predicting the outcome of surgical re-intervention within 2 years after EA. Based on the ML model, dysmenorrhea and duration of menstruation have the highest impact on the surgical re-intervention rate. Conclusion Although machine learning techniques are gaining popularity in development of clinical prediction tools, this study shows that ML is not necessarily superior to the traditional statistical LR techniques. Both techniques should be considered when developing a clinical prediction model. Both models can identify the clinical predictors to surgical re-intervention and contribute to the shared decision-making process in the clinical practice. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |