Mosapride Improves Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Body Function in Patients With Minor Disorders of Esophageal Peristalsis
Autor: | Seun Ja Park, Won Moon, Hye Jung Kwon, Kyoungwon Jung, Gyung Mi Kim, Sung Eun Kim, Hee Kyoung Joo, Moo In Park, Jae Hyun Kim |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Manometry Symptom assessment Esophageal motility disorders Gastroenterology Esophageal sphincter lower 03 medical and health sciences Mosapride 0302 clinical medicine Interquartile range Internal medicine medicine In patient Respiratory system Peristalsis Univariate analysis business.industry medicine.disease Esophageal motility disorder 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Esophageal sphincter Original Article 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Neurology (clinical) business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility |
ISSN: | 2093-0887 2093-0879 |
DOI: | 10.5056/jnm19062 |
Popis: | Background/Aims High-resolution manometry (HRM) has broadened the awareness of minor esophageal peristaltic disorders. However, the treatments for these minor disorders are limited and the role of prokinetics has been controversial. This study evaluates the effect of mosapride in patients with minor peristaltic disorders. Methods This study prospectively enrolled 21 patients with esophageal symptoms who were diagnosed with minor peristaltic disorders by gastroscopy and HRM using the Chicago classification version 3.0. Patients received mosapride 30 mg daily for 2 weeks. Symptoms were assessed using the abbreviated World Health Organization quality of life scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and a HRM study was performed before and after 2 weeks of treatment. Results HRM metrics of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) respiratory mean pressure (median 14.6 mmHg vs 17.3 mmHg; interquartile range [IQR] 8.7-22.5 mmHg vs 12.5-25.9 mmHg; P = 0.004) and distal contractile integral (median 343.8 mmHg·sec·cm vs 698.1 mmHg·sec·cm; IQR 286.5-795.9 mmHg·sec·cm vs 361.0-1127.6 mmHg·sec·cm; P = 0.048) were significantly increased after treatment. Complete response (≥ 80.0%), satisfactory response (≥ 50.0%), partial response (< 50.0%), and refractory response rates were 19.0%, 52.4%, 14.3%, and 14.3%, respectively. However, there was no statistical difference in all WHOQOL-BREF scores before and after treatment. Univariate analysis showed LES respiratory mean pressure (P = 0.036) was associated with symptom improvement (complete + satisfactory group). However, no statistical difference was found in other factors after multivariate analysis. Conclusions Mosapride improved esophageal symptoms and significantly increased LES respiratory mean pressure and distal contractile integral. Therefore, mosapride could enhance LES and esophageal body contraction pressures in patients with minor peristaltic disorders. (J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020;26:232-240) |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |