Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus capecitabine plus docetaxel with planned crossover to the alternate single agent in metastatic breast cancer
| Autor: | Rafat Ansari, C.A. Russell, S-C Chen, S.-B. Kim, J.A. De La Cruz Vargas, J.F. Gill, Andrew D. Seidman, Lee S. Schwartzberg, L. Zhao, L.E. Fein, Lowell L. Hart, J. Cavalheiro, D.F. Tai, R. S. Stein, J. F. Stewart, Mauro Orlando, Adam Brufsky, Coleman K. Obasaju |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Breast Neoplasms Docetaxel Kaplan-Meier Estimate Neutropenia Deoxycytidine Gastroenterology Disease-Free Survival Capecitabine Internal medicine Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols medicine Humans Neoplasm Metastasis Aged Aged 80 and over Chemotherapy Cross-Over Studies business.industry Hematology Middle Aged medicine.disease Gemcitabine Crossover study Surgery Oncology Fluorouracil Female Taxoids business Febrile neutropenia medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Annals of Oncology. 22:1094-1101 |
| ISSN: | 0923-7534 |
| Popis: | Background Safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) and capecitabine plus docetaxel (CD) were compared in patients with metastatic breast cancer, where the alternate crossover monotherapy (GD→C or CD→G) was predetermined. Patients and methods Patients were randomly assigned to 3-week cycles of either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 or capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1. Upon progression, patients received crossover monotherapy. Primary end point was time to progression (TtP). Secondary end points evaluated overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Results Despite over-accrual of 475 patients, the trial matured with only 324 of 385 planned TtP events due to patient discontinuations. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was not captured in this study. More CD patients (28%) discontinued due to AEs than GD patients (18.0%, P = 0.009). TtP [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.101, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885–1.370, P = 0.387] and OS (HR = 1.031, 95% CI 0.830–1.280, P = 0.785) were not significantly different comparing GD and CD. ORR was not statistically different (P = 0.239) comparing GD (72 of 207, 34.8%) and CD (78 of 191, 40.8%). TtP, OS, and ORR were not significantly different comparing crossover groups. GD caused greater fatigue, hepatotoxicity, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia but not febrile neutropenia; CD caused more hand–foot syndrome, gastrointestinal toxicity, and mucositis. Conclusions GD and CD produced similar efficacy and toxicity profiles consistent with prior clinical experience. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|