A framework for understanding how activities associated with dog ownership relate to human well-being
Autor: | Sophie Hall, John Maltby, Daniel S. Mills, Ana Maria Barcelos, Niko Kargas |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Quality of life Adolescent Applied psychology Self-concept Psychological intervention lcsh:Medicine 050109 social psychology Pilot Projects Personal Satisfaction Article Young Adult Quality of life (healthcare) Dogs D390 Veterinary Sciences not elsewhere classified Animals Humans Psychology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences 050102 behavioral science & comparative psychology lcsh:Science health care economics and organizations Qualitative Research Aged Emotion Multidisciplinary lcsh:R 05 social sciences Human-Animal Bond Ownership Life satisfaction Pets Focus Groups Middle Aged Focus group Mental health Self Concept Mental Health Social behaviour Well-being lcsh:Q Female Psychiatric disorders Stress and resilience Qualitative research |
Zdroj: | Scientific Reports Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 |
Popis: | There is notorious inconsistency regarding mental health benefits of dog ownership, partially due to repeated cross-sectional studies comparing dog owners and non-owners, without taking into account the heterogeneity of dog-owner dyads, especially the activities with which the owners are involved. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive framework of the most important dog human related activities and their impact on owner well-being. Six focus groups with 35 dog owners were conducted, and their audio transcripts thematically analysed. Dog human related activities and themes of activities were linked to their reported changes in well-being through matrix coding. A framework of 58 dog human related activities linked with their specific hedonic well-being, life satisfaction and eudaimonic well-being outcomes was generated. Most activities were reported to improve owner’s well-being, (e.g. human–dog tactile interaction increases owner’s self-esteem), and a minority was mainly associated with negative outcomes. The richness of the framework presented in this study reinforces the importance of assessing dog ownership well-being outcomes based on specific dog human related activities with which dog owners are involved. This new and systematic investigative approach should decrease inconsistencies in the field and facilitate mental health interventions and study designs of a higher level of evidence. Introduction Mental health problems are one of the main disease burdens of society and are growing worldwide1. In the United Kingdom, mental health problems represent the largest single cause of disability, with estimated costs of £105 billion a year; one in four adults in the country suffers at least one diagnosable mental health problem in any given year2. Psychological changes led by pet ownership may have an important impact on mental health, with associated economic savings (£2.5 billion/year—UK)3. However, studies in this field are inconsistent, and how pet ownership might impact on human well-being has not been explored systematically. Heterogeneity within important aspects of pet ownership (e.g. amount of exercise undertaken, level of disclosure of personal emotional information with their dogs) may explain why some individuals may benefit while others do not4,5,6. It is therefore not surprising that investigations on depression have shown pet ownership improves7,8,9, as well as makes no difference10,11,12 and even worsens the condition13,14. Similar contradictions extend to other aspects of well-being, such as loneliness8,15, stress13,16, anxiety13,17, human functioning11,18 and life satisfaction19,20. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |