Comparison between Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analyses for Accuracy in Measuring Whole Body Muscle Mass and Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass
| Autor: | Soyeon Ahn, Hak Chul Jang, Sung Hee Choi, Kyoung Min Kim, Young Ji Kim, Seo-Young Lee, Myoung Jin Ji, Soo Lim |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male 030209 endocrinology & metabolism lcsh:TX341-641 Muscle mass Models Biological Article Body Mass Index 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine Absorptiometry Photon Sex Factors Electric Impedance Medicine Humans bioelectrical impedance analysis 030212 general & internal medicine Muscle Skeletal Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Adiposity Aged Aged 80 and over Nutrition and Dietetics medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Reproducibility of Results Mean age Middle Aged Skeletal muscle mass Confidence interval muscle mass Multivariate Analysis Body Composition Linear Models Female Whole body business Nuclear medicine Body mass index Bioelectrical impedance analysis lcsh:Nutrition. Foods and food supply dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Food Science |
| Zdroj: | Nutrients Nutrients, Vol 10, Iss 6, p 738 (2018) Volume 10 Issue 6 |
| ISSN: | 2072-6643 |
| Popis: | We evaluate the accuracy of whole body muscle mass (WBMM) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using an InBody770 machine (InBody, Seoul, Korea) referenced to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 507 people (mean age 63.7 ± 10.8 years, body mass index (BMI) 25.2 ± 3.5 kg/m2). Mean WBMMs measured by BIA and DXA were 49.3 ± 6.6 kg and 46.8 ± 6.5 kg in men and 36.1 ± 4.7 kg and 34.0 ± 4.8 kg in women, respectively. The respective effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference were 2.49 (2.22&ndash 2.76) for men, and 2.12 (1.91&ndash 2.33) for women. Mean ASMMs measured by BIA and DXA were 22.1 ± 3.3 kg and 19.9 ± 3.2 kg in men, and 15.3 ± 2.5 kg and 13.5 ± 2.2 kg in women, respectively. The respective effect sizes and 95% CIs for the difference were 2.26 (2.10&ndash 2.41) for men and 1.75 (1.65&ndash 1.87) for women. The BIA clearly overestimated WBMM by 2.28 kg and ASMM by 1.97 kg compared with DXA. Using BMI, gender, and fat percentage, we derive equations that improved the residuals to < 2 kg between methods from 38.29% to 85.91% for WBMM and 52.78% to 97.02% for ASMM. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|