Mobile Arm Supports: Evidence-Based Benefits and Criteria for Use
| Autor: | Philip S. Requejo, Pierre Leung, Robert L. Waters, Jane M. Baumgarten, Rodney H. Adkins, Michal Atkins, Yuriko Lynn Yasuda |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2008 |
| Předmět: |
Physical Therapy Specialty
Orthotic Devices medicine.medical_specialty Activities of daily living Delphi Technique medicine.medical_treatment Technical Perspective Deltoid curve Quadriplegia Biceps Spinal Cord Diseases Physical medicine and rehabilitation Activities of Daily Living medicine Humans Spinal cord injury Tetraplegia Spinal Cord Injuries Evidence-Based Medicine Rehabilitation business.industry Data Collection Evidence-based medicine medicine.disease Orthotic device Wheelchairs Arm Physical therapy Neurology (clinical) business |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 31:388-393 |
| ISSN: | 2045-7723 1079-0268 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760741 |
| Popis: | To collect data from therapists regarding criteria for use and activities that individuals with C4-C5 tetraplegia can perform using a mobile arm support (MAS) that they otherwise could not. Reasons for nonuse, equipment design limitations, and therapist training needs were also studied.A modified Delphi approach was used to conduct an e-mail survey for which the response to each question was analyzed and used to formulate the subsequent question.Rehabilitation centers.Eighteen occupational therapists (most affiliated with 1 of the federally designated Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems) with extensive experience in the treatment of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).The key physical prerequisite for successful use of the MAS was at least minimal strength of the deltoid and biceps muscles; 92% of respondents indicated that they would fit an MAS for motivated patients having very weak (2/5) biceps and deltoid muscles. According to the therapists, 100% (n = 30) of their clients were able to perform at least 1 activity using a MAS that they were unable to perform without the device. These activities included (in descending frequency) eating, page turning, driving a power wheelchair, brushing teeth, keyboarding, writing, name signing, drawing, painting, scratching nose, playing board games, accessing electronic devices, drinking, and grooming. Equipment design limitations included increased wheelchair width and problems managing the arms while reclining.Mobile arm supports allow persons with C4-C5 tetraplegia to engage in activities that they otherwise cannot perform with their arms. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|