Long-term urological management in spinal injury units in the UK and Eire: a follow-up study
| Autor: | P.J.R. Shah, I. Omar, J R Burki, Rizwan Hamid |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors MEDLINE Urologic Surgical Procedure Surveys and Questionnaires parasitic diseases medicine Humans Longitudinal Studies Urinary Bladder Neurogenic Disease management (health) Spinal Cord Injuries Spinal injury Ultrasonography Urinary bladder business.industry Follow up studies Disease Management General Medicine United Kingdom Surgery Urodynamics medicine.anatomical_structure Neurology Urologic Surgical Procedures Female Neurology (clinical) business Ireland |
| Zdroj: | Spinal Cord. 52:640-645 |
| ISSN: | 1476-5624 1362-4393 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/sc.2014.90 |
| Popis: | The majority of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) will develop neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). These patients require a long-term urological follow-up. The follow-up protocol has varied across SCI units in the United Kingdom and Eire. We reviewed the long-term management in the SCI units to identify changes in practice over a decade and compared them to current guidelines.We present results of a review of all SCI centres in the United Kingdom and Eire on their long-term urological management before and after the current guidelines and compared the results with European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on NLUTD and the proposed British guidelines for the urological management of patients with SCI. Data were collected through questionnaires posted to SCI units.SCI patients are followed up in outpatients annually in the SCI centres and the frequency of follow-up remains largely unchanged. More SCI units perform renal tract imaging annually as a part of SCI follow-up. Most units follow the proposed British guideline indications for urodynamics and do not perform 'routine urodynamics'.We conclude that the long-term management of SCI patients in SCI units in the United Kingdom and Eire has changed overtime to follow the proposed British guidelines. EAU guidelines offer a more extensive follow-up regime. Last, there is a continued lack of high-quality evidence to support an optimal long-term follow-up protocol. Importantly, there is a lack of evidence on clinical outcomes when these guidelines have been followed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|