Long-Term Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
| Autor: | Alison K. Snyder-Warwick, Gary B. Skolnick, Kamlesh B. Patel, William M Padovano, Sybill D. Naidoo |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Orthodontics
Nasoalveolar Molding business.industry Cleft Lip Infant 030206 dentistry Molding (process) Esthetics Dental Nose Term (time) Cleft Palate 03 medical and health sciences Treatment Outcome 0302 clinical medicine Otorhinolaryngology Meta-analysis Humans Medicine In patient Oral Surgery 030223 otorhinolaryngology business |
| Zdroj: | The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 59:462-474 |
| ISSN: | 1545-1569 1055-6656 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/10556656211009702 |
| Popis: | Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate long-term treatment effects of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Design: Included manuscripts met the following criteria: (1) involved patients with UCLP who received NAM; (2) included comparison group(s) who either received non-NAM passive presurgical infant orthopedic appliances (PSIO) or who did not receive any PSIO; (3) reported at least one objective or validated measure of nasolabial, craniofacial, or palatal form; and (4) had patient follow-up beyond 4 years of age. Results: A total of 12 studies were included in this review. Meta-analyses were possible for Asher-McDade parameters and cephalometric measurements. Compared to patients who did not receive any PSIO, those who underwent NAM therapy were more likely to have good to excellent frontal nasal form (Risk ratio: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.24-3.68) and vermillion border (Risk ratio: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.19-2.71). However, there were no statistically significant differences in cephalometric measurements between these groups. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between patients receiving NAM versus non-NAM PSIO. There was insufficient evidence to determine the impact of NAM on dental arch development. Conclusions: The preponderance of evidence in this review suggests that NAM produces benefits in nasolabial aesthetic form when compared with no appliance-based presurgical treatment. However, there is insufficient evidence to conclude whether NAM produces such benefits when compared with other passive PSIOs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|