Automated Construction of a False Digital Alibi
| Autor: | Aniello Castiglione, Alfredo De Santis, Giuseppe Cattaneo, Mario Ianulardo, Giancarlo De Maio |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Università degli Studi di Salerno (UNISA), Chercheur indépendant, A Min Tjoa, Gerald Quirchmayr, Ilsun You, Lida Xu, TC 8, WG 8.4, WG 8.9 |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Digital Evidence
Computer science [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences Digital forensics Internet privacy 02 engineering and technology Automated Alibi False Digital Alibi Computer security computer.software_genre False accusation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Digital evidence Counter-Forensics 020204 information systems Server 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Digital Alibi [INFO]Computer Science [cs] 030216 legal & forensic medicine business.industry Computer forensics 16. Peace & justice Alibi False Digital Evidence False Alibi Intervention (law) Digital Forensics Anti-Forensics The Internet business Digital Investigation computer |
| Zdroj: | Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1st Availability, Reliability and Security (CD-ARES) 1st Availability, Reliability and Security (CD-ARES), Aug 2011, Vienna, Austria. pp.359-373, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-23300-5_28⟩ Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783642232992 ARES |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-642-23300-5_28⟩ |
| Popis: | Part 2: Workshop; International audience; Recent legal cases have shown that digital evidence is becoming more widely used in court proceedings (by defense, accusation, public prosecutor, etc.). Digital tracks can be left on computers, phones, digital cameras as well as third party servers belonging to Internet Service Providers (ISPs), telephone providers and companies that provide services via Internet such as YouTube, Facebook and Gmail.This work highlights the possibility to set up a false digital alibi in a fully automatic way without any human intervention. A forensic investigation on the digital evidence produced cannot establish whether such traces have been produced through either human activity or by an automated tool. These considerations stress the difference between digital and physical - namely traditional - evidence. Essentially, digital evidence should be considered relevant only if supported by evidence collected using traditional investigation techniques. The results of this work should be considered by anyone involved in a Digital Forensics investigation, due to it demonstrating that court rulings should not be based only on digital evidence, with it always being correlated to additional information provided by the various disciplines of Forensics Sciences. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|