A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of in Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Primary Basal Cell Carcinoma
Autor: | Constantin Caruntu, Mihai Lupu, Iris Maria Popa, Vlad Mihai Voiculescu, Ana Caruntu |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Reflectance confocal microscopy
medicine.medical_specialty lcsh:Medicine Review reflectance confocal microscopy 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine basal cell carcinoma systematic review Internal medicine medicine Basal cell carcinoma Methodological quality business.industry Incidence (epidemiology) lcsh:R Cancer General Medicine medicine.disease diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis in vivo 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Meta-analysis Diagnostic odds ratio Skin cancer business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Medicine Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 9, p 1462 (2019) |
ISSN: | 2077-0383 |
Popis: | Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer worldwide and its incidence is constantly rising. Early diagnosis and treatment can significantly reduce patient morbidity and healthcare costs. The value of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) in non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosis is still under debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of RCM in primary BCC. PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to July 05, 2019, to collect articles concerning primary BCC diagnosis through RCM. The studies’ methodological quality was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 13.0, RevMan 5.0, and MetaDisc 1.4 software. We included 15 studies totaling a number of 4163 lesions. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87−0.95; I2 = 85.27%) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85−0.97; I2 = 94.61%), the pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 13.51 (95% CI, 5.8−31.37; I2 = 91.01%) and 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05−0.14; I2 = 84.83%), and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 160.31 (95% CI, 64.73−397.02; I2 = 71%). Despite the heterogeneity and risk of bias, this study demonstrates that RCM, through its high sensitivity and specificity, may have a significant clinical impact on the diagnosis of primary BCC. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |