A cross-sectional study into medical students' perceptions of healthcare regulation and self-reported compliance: A study conducted in the City of Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, 2016

Autor: Sandra F. Oude Wesselink, Erik J. Koornneef, Paul Robben
Přispěvatelé: Health Care Governance (HCG), Erasmus MC other
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education. BioMed Central Ltd.
BMC Medical Education, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2018)
ISSN: 1472-6920
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1393-x
Popis: Background Although healthcare regulation is commonplace, there is limited evidence of its impact. Making sure that healthcare professionals comply with the regulatory requirements is a prerequisite to achieving effective regulation. Therefore, investigating factors that influence compliance may provide better insights into how regulators can be more effective. This study aimed to find out if medical students’ perceptions of regulation in the United Arab Emirates are associated with self-reported regulatory compliance. Methods In the cross-sectional study, we administered a structured questionnaire to students of medicine with different statements concerning their perceptions of healthcare regulation and self-reported compliance. The statements included statement regarding the legitimacy, fairness and regulatory performance, as well as the risk to getting caught and being punished. The association between perceptions and self-reported compliance was analyzed using multiple regression models. Results One hundred and six Year 3 and 4 pre-clinical medicine students (56.4% response rate) completed the survey. Almost 40% of the students rated their level of awareness and understanding of regulation as Good or Very Good., despite their lack of direct contact with the regulatory authorities (less than 10% reported monthly or more frequent contact). Self-reported compliance was high with almost 85% of the students either agreeing or strongly agreeing with the four compliance statements (mean score 4.1 out of 5). The findings suggest that positive perceptions of the regulator’s performance (β 0.27; 95% CI 0.13–0.41), fairness of the regulatory processes (β 0.25; 95% CI 0.11–0.38) and its legitimacy (β 0.23; 95% CI 0.05–0.41), are stronger associated with compliance than the perceived risks of getting caught and being punished (β 0.10; 95% CI -0.04 – 0.23). Conclusions To improve compliant behavior, healthcare regulators should pay more attention to their own perceived performance, as well as the perceived fairness and legitimacy of their regulatory processes rather than focusing on more traditional methods of deterrence, such as perceived risk of getting caught and being published. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1393-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: