Bulk tumour cell migration in lung carcinomas might be more common than epithelial-mesenchymal transition and be differently regulated
Autor: | Helmut Popper, Sylvia Eidenhammer, Martin Zacharias, Luka Brcic |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Cancer Research Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Lung Neoplasms Vimentin Adenocarcinoma lcsh:RC254-282 Metastasis Receptors Interleukin-8A 03 medical and health sciences Cell Movement Squamous cell carcinoma Carcinoma Non-Small-Cell Lung Genetics medicine Humans Epithelial–mesenchymal transition Twist Neoplasm Metastasis Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases Fascin biology Mad Cadherin Phospholipase C gamma Wnt signaling pathway Bulk migration Cell migration lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens medicine.disease Cadherins 030104 developmental biology Oncology biology.protein Cancer research Carcinoma Squamous Cell Protein expression Lung cancer Tks5 Research Article |
Zdroj: | BMC Cancer BMC Cancer, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2018) |
ISSN: | 1471-2407 |
Popis: | Background Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is one mechanism of carcinoma migration, while complex tumour migration or bulk migration is another - best demontrated by tumour cells invading blood vessels. Methods Thirty cases of non-small cell lung carcinomas were used for identifying genes responsible for bulk cell migration, 232 squamous cell and adenocarcinomas to identify bulk migration rates. Genes expressed differently in the primary tumour and in the invasion front were regarded as relevant in migration and further validated in 528 NSCLC cases represented on tissue microarrays (TMAs) and metastasis TMAs. Results Markers relevant for bulk cancer cell migration were regulated differently when compared with EMT: Twist expressed in primary tumour, invasion front, and metastasis was not associated with TGFβ1 and canonical Wnt, as Slug, Snail, and Smads were negative and β-Catenin expressed membraneously. In the majority of tumours, E-Cadherin was downregulated at the invasive front, but not absent, but, coexpressed with N-Cadherin. Vimentin was coexpressed with cytokeratins at the invasion site in few cases, whereas fascin expression was seen in a majority. Expression of ERK1/2 was downregulated, PLCγ was only expressed at the invasive front and in metastasis. Brk and Mad, genes identified in Drosophila border cell migration, might be important for bulk migration and metastasis, together with invadipodia proteins Tks5 and Rab40B, which were only upregulated at the invasive front and in metastasis. CXCR1 was expressed equally in all carcinomas, as opposed to CXCR2 and 4, which were only expressed in few tumours. Conclusion Bulk cancer cell migration seems predominant in AC and SCC. Twist, vimentin, fascin, Mad, Brk, Tsk5, Rab40B, ERK1/2 and PLCγ are associated with bulk cancer cell migration. This type of migration requires an orchestrated activation of proteins to keep the cells bound to each other and to coordinate movement. This hypothesis needs to be proven experimentally. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4640-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |