Effects of Hand Hygiene Using 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Natural Soap During Hand Rubbing Followed by Alcohol-Based 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sanitizer Lotion in the Operating Room
Autor: | Junko Tanaka, Takayoshi Kawahara, Sadanori Akita, Tomoyuki Akita, Akihiro Masunaga, Masaki Fujioka |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Operating Rooms
media_common.quotation_subject Colony Count Microbial Dentistry Alcohol Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Soaps chemistry.chemical_compound Hand sanitizer Hygiene Hand rubbing Chlorhexidine gluconate Outcome Assessment Health Care Medicine Humans Hand Hygiene Discovery Express media_common Skin Cross-Over Studies Bacteria Emollients Ethanol business.industry Chlorhexidine Disinfection chemistry Lotion Emergency Medicine Anti-Infective Agents Local business Surgical site infection Hand Disinfection |
Zdroj: | Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) |
Popis: | OBJECTIVE: Hand hygiene using either 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) or natural soap during hand rubbing, followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion in the operating room was compared to assess bacterial reduction, skin moisture, skin texture, and hand hygiene using qualitative questionnaires. APPROACH: A crossover study with 36 professional scrub nurses at two medical centers was performed to compare 4% CHG followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion, the Two-stage method with handwashing using natural soap followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion, and the Waterless method, after a period of 10 days of use. The study completely followed CONSORT, www.consort-statement.org. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in bacterial reduction based on the bacterial colony-forming units between the two methods. The skin moisture and skin roughness scores were not significantly different between the two methods. The Waterless method was significantly better than the Two-stage method regarding “foaming,” “quality,” “longevity” (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |