Timing of oral intake after esophagectomy: A narrative review of the literature and case report
| Autor: | Stephani Johnson, David A. August, Jane Ziegler |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Nothing by mouth Esophageal Neoplasms medicine.medical_treatment Medicine (miscellaneous) Anastomotic Leak Anastomosis Enteral administration law.invention Enteral Nutrition Postoperative Complications Randomized controlled trial law Humans Medicine Intensive care medicine Nutrition and Dietetics business.industry Confounding Esophageal cancer medicine.disease Esophagectomy Treatment Outcome Parenteral nutrition business |
| Zdroj: | Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 37:536-554 |
| ISSN: | 1941-2452 0884-5336 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ncp.10777 |
| Popis: | Esophagectomy, a treatment modality for esophageal cancer, is associated with high rates of morbidity, the most common being anastomotic leaks and pulmonary complications. The current standard of care for nutrition support after esophagectomy includes a period of nothing by mouth with enteral nutrition support via jejunostomy tube owing to the concern of increasing the risk of anastomotic leak as a result of early postoperative oral intake. However, the optimal timing of oral diet initiation remains controversial. This narrative review presents a patient who incurred an anastomotic leak following esophagectomy after initiation of oral intake on postoperative day 5 and evaluates the current literature on the timing of oral diet initiation after esophagectomy. A systematic literature search was performed to assess current evidence evaluating early oral diet (EOD) initiation after esophagectomy. Over the past 5 years, 11 studies have evaluated the impact of EOD initiation after esophagectomy in comparison with a conventional feeding regimen, including a period of nothing by mouth with enteral or parenteral nutrition support. The available evidence suggests that EOD initiation does not increase rates of complications after esophagectomy. However, the evidence is limited by the lack of a standardized definition of what constitutes EOD initiation, patient selection bias, variations in nutrition support provided in the studies, and lack of statistical analyses evaluating the impact of potential confounding variables. Additional research with larger, high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed to determine the optimal timing of diet initiation after esophagectomy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text