The PROCESS 2018 statement: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines
| Autor: | Riaz A. Agha, Mimi R. Borrelli, Reem Farwana, Kiron Koshy, Alexander J. Fowler, Dennis P. Orgill, Hongyi Zhu, Abdulrahman Alsawadi, Ashraf Noureldin, Ashwini Rao, Ather Enam, Achilleas Thoma, Mohammad Bashashati, Baskaran Vasudevan, Andrew Beamish, Ben Challacombe, Rudy Leon De Wilde, David Machado-Aranda, Daniel Laskin, Dattatraya Muzumdar, Anil D'cruz, Todd Manning, Donagh Healy, Duilio Pagano, Prabudh Goel, Priya Ranganathan, Prathamesh S. Pai, Shahzad Raja, M. Hammad Ather, Hüseyin kadioäžlu, Iain Nixon, Indraneil Mukherjee, Juan Gómez Rivas, Kandiah Raveendran, Laura Derbyshire, Michele Valmasoni, Mushtaq Chalkoo, Nicholas Raison, Oliver Muensterer, Patrick Bradley, Roberto Coppola, Raafat Afifi, David Rosin, Roberto Klappenbach, Rolf Wynn, Salvatore Giordano, Somprakas Basu, Salim Surani, Paritosh Suman, Mangesh Thorat, Veeru Kasi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Consensus Delphi Technique Process (engineering) Guidelines as Topic Computer-assisted web interviewing 030230 surgery 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans computer.programming_language Statement (computer science) Publishing business.industry General Medicine Guideline Transparency (behavior) Expert group Checklist Surgery 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Surgical Procedures Operative business computer Delphi |
| Zdroj: | International journal of surgery (London, England). 60 |
| ISSN: | 1743-9159 |
| Popis: | Introduction The PROCESS guidelines were published in 2016 to provide a structure for reporting surgical case series. The PROCESS guidelines have since been widely endorsed by a number of journals. The requirement to report compliance with each item outlined in the PROCESS statement has improved the reporting transparency of case series across a number of surgical specialties. Here, we undertook a new Delphi consensus exercise to update the PROCESS guidelines. Methods All members of the previous Delphi group were invited to participate. In addition, researchers, editors, and reviewers who have previously published or reviewed case series with the International Journal of Surgery were invited to collaborate. An online questionnaire was sent to participants asking them to rate their agreement with amendments to each of the 29 items. Results 140 experts were invited to participate, 56 people agreed to participate, and 45 (80%) recipients completed the survey. There was a high level of agreement amongst the expert group, and unanimous consensus was reached in the first round. All except three proposed items were accepted, and the original guidelines were modified accordingly. Conclusion A modified and improved PROCESS checklist is presented, after a Delphi consensus exercise was completed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect