Satisfaction with care among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: development and first steps of validation of the REPERES-60 questionnaire

Autor: Virginie Migeot, Isabelle Gasquet, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, Roger Salamon, Isabelle Ingrand, Gautier Defossez, Lynda Sifer-Riviere, Pierre Ingrand
Přispěvatelé: Institut Universitaire de Santé Publique [Poitiers], Centre hospitalier universitaire de Poitiers (CHU Poitiers), Plateforme de génétique moléculaire des cancers d'Aquitaine, Institut Bergonié [Bordeaux], UNICANCER-UNICANCER, Troubles du comportement alimentaire de l'adolescent (UMR_S 669), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11), CERMES - Centre de recherche Médecine, Science, Santé Société (CERMES - UMR 8169 / U750), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Epidémiologie, santé publique et développement, Université Bordeaux Segalen - Bordeaux 2-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-IFR99-ISPED, Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Mouillet, Evelyne, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Poitiers ( CHU Poitiers ), Institut Bergonié - CRLCC Bordeaux, Troubles du comportement alimentaire de l'adolescent ( UMR_S 669 ), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ), Centre de recherche Médecine, Science, Santé et Société ( CERMES ), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -École des hautes études en sciences sociales ( EHESS ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Université Bordeaux Segalen - Bordeaux 2-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -IFR99-ISPED
Rok vydání: 2007
Předmět:
MESH: Combined Modality Therapy
Cancer Research
MESH: Mastectomy
MESH : Aged
MESH: Logistic Models
MESH : Breast Neoplasms
MESH: Health Care Surveys
MESH: Risk Assessment
MESH : Neoplasm Invasiveness
Care provision
MESH: Patient Participation
0302 clinical medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
Medicine
MESH : Neoplasm Staging
MESH : Female
030212 general & internal medicine
MESH : Risk Assessment
Mastectomy
MESH: Treatment Outcome
MESH: Aged
education.field_of_study
MESH: Middle Aged
MESH : Questionnaires
MESH : Chemotherapy
Adjuvant

[ SDV.SPEE ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
MESH: Neoplasm Staging
MESH : Adult
Focus Groups
Middle Aged
lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
Combined Modality Therapy
3. Good health
MESH: Reproducibility of Results
Treatment Outcome
Oncology
MESH: Chemotherapy
Adjuvant

Chemotherapy
Adjuvant

Patient Satisfaction
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
France
MESH : Mastectomy
MESH : Focus Groups
Research Article
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
MESH : Patient Satisfaction
MESH: Radiotherapy
Adjuvant

Population
Breast Neoplasms
MESH : Treatment Outcome
lcsh:RC254-282
Risk Assessment
MESH : Radiotherapy
Adjuvant

03 medical and health sciences
Patient satisfaction
Quality of life (healthcare)
Breast cancer
Genetics
Humans
MESH : Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
MESH : Health Care Surveys
Patient participation
MESH : France
education
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Gynecology
MESH: Humans
business.industry
MESH : Reproducibility of Results
MESH: Questionnaires
MESH : Humans
Discriminant validity
Reproducibility of Results
MESH: Adult
MESH: Neoplasm Invasiveness
medicine.disease
Focus group
MESH: Patient Satisfaction
MESH : Patient Participation
MESH: France
Logistic Models
[SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Family medicine
Health Care Surveys
MESH: Focus Groups
[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Radiotherapy
Adjuvant

Patient Participation
MESH : Combined Modality Therapy
business
MESH: Female
MESH: Breast Neoplasms
MESH : Logistic Models
Zdroj: BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer, BioMed Central, 2007, 7, pp.129. ⟨10.1186/1471-2407-7-129⟩
BMC Cancer, 2007, 7, pp.129. ⟨10.1186/1471-2407-7-129⟩
BMC Cancer, Vol 7, Iss 1, p 129 (2007)
BMC Cancer, BioMed Central, 2007, 7, pp.129. 〈10.1186/1471-2407-7-129〉
ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-129⟩
Popis: Background The care itinerary for cancer involves difficulties that occur in several different areas, whether in the diagnostic procedures, in surgery, or in adjuvant treatment. The aim of this work was to obtain a valid instrument measuring satisfaction among patients with breast cancer and exploring their care itinerary overall. Methods Development phase: Patient focus groups were implemented in two French regions in order to identify areas of satisfaction in relation to the different phases of care provision in breast cancer. On the basis of the literature and the themes and wordings derived from the focus groups, the patients identified several areas of satisfaction, which they found to be partially covered in an American satisfaction measure that has been validated in the French general population (the Consumer Satisfaction Survey in its French version, CSS-VF, 39 items). The patient focus groups suggested adaptation of certain dimensions of this instrument to the potential care providers (37 items) and produced 45 new items in six areas. Validation phase: Using a large sample of patients (cohort of 820 women with invasive non-metastatic breast cancer) approached one month after treatment, this phase selected items that were comprehensible (non-response rate < 10%), non-redundant (r < 0.80) and reproducible (test-retest conducted on a sub-sample of 166 patients). The dimensions were identified by factor analysis on the selected items. Divergent and discriminant validity were assessed (relationships with quality of life questionnaire, comparisons between extreme groups). Results Results were in favour of not inserting additional broken-down items into the CSS-VF and retaining 21 new items. The factor analysis found the initial structure of the CSS-VF (39 items in 9 dimensions) and the 21 new items divide up into four dimensions (listening abilities and information provided by doctors, organisation and follow-up of medical care provision, psychological support, material environment). No redundancy was observed between new items and CSS-VF items. Internal consistency was high. Divergent and discriminant validity were satisfactory. Conclusion Adding four new dimensions to the CSS-VF yielded a valid 60-item instrument for assessment of care provided in breast cancer. These promising results now require further investigations of its responsiveness and its robustness in other linguistic, cultural and healthcare settings.
Databáze: OpenAIRE