Cardiac physiology in post myocardial infarction patients: the effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs—a systematic review and update meta-analysis
| Autor: | Sunil K. Jha, Brandon Cave, Aghapy Kirolos, Yehoshua C. Levine, Rami N. Khouzam, Irene Kirolos, Fiorella Pendola, Rajesh Kabra, Danny Yakoub, Omar Picado |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Cardiac function curve
030506 rehabilitation medicine.medical_specialty Ejection fraction business.industry Review Article General Medicine 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology medicine.disease Confidence interval law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial Strictly standardized mean difference law Internal medicine Meta-analysis medicine Cardiology End-diastolic volume Myocardial infarction 0305 other medical science business |
| Zdroj: | Annals of Translational Medicine. 7:416-416 |
| ISSN: | 2305-5847 2305-5839 |
| DOI: | 10.21037/atm.2019.08.64 |
| Popis: | Cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) is a recognized non-pharmacological modality to decrease mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRP on the cardiac physiology in patients post myocardial infarction (MI). Online database search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, COCHRANE, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR were performed (1988–Mar 2016); key bibliographies were reviewed. Studies comparing post MI patients who were enrolled in a CRP to those who were not, were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) by random and fixed effects models of pooled data were calculated. Study quality was assessed using CONSORT criteria. Outcomes of interest measured included resting and maximum heart rate (HR), peak VO(2), ejection fraction (EF%), wall motion score index (WMSI), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) in cardiac rehabilitation patients versus control. Search strategy yielded 147 studies, 23 studies fulfilled the selection criteria, 19 of which were RCTs. These included a total of 1,683 patients; 827 were enrolled in a CRP while 855 did not receive the intervention. Median age was 58 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, comorbidities, severity of CAD, baseline EF or HR. Meta-analysis of data included demonstrated that CRP patients had lower post-intervention resting HR than non-CRP patients (SMD: −0.59; 95% CI: −0.73 to −0.46, fixed effect model P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|