Claiming the right to rule: regime legitimation strategies from 1900 to 2019

Autor: Marcus Tannenberg, Christian von Soest, Anna Lührmann, Johannes Gerschewski, Michael Bernhard
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
procedure
Sociology and Political Science
0211 other engineering and technologies
legitimacy
02 engineering and technology
Methodik
Legitimation
Legalität
cult of personality
charisma
050602 political science & public administration
Political science
domination
media_common
Verfassung
Rationalität
Ideologie
achievement
05 social sciences
methodology
Verfahren
Herrschaft
populism
0506 political science
Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme
Expression (architecture)
Political System
Constitution
Government

ddc:300
politische Strategie
Ideology
performance
Populismus
Politikwissenschaft
national state
media_common.quotation_subject
rationality
Systems of governments & states
legality
Measure (mathematics)
expert survey
Leistungsfähigkeit
constitution
Leistung
political strategy
Messung
Positive economics
Political Process
Elections
Political Sociology
Political Culture

politisches System
Legitimacy
politische Willensbildung
politische Soziologie
politische Kultur

021110 strategic
defence & security studies

legitimation strategies
political system
ideology
Construct validity
Rule-based system
Populism
Personenkult
ddc:320
Political Science and International Relations
ddc:321
measurement
Staat
staatliche Organisationsformen

Staat
Zdroj: European Political Science Review
Popis: Governments routinely justify why the regime over which they preside is entitled to rule. These claims to legitimacy are both an expression of and shape of how a rule is being exercised. In this paper, we introduce new expert-coded measures of regime legitimation strategies (RLS) for 183 countries in the world from 1900 to 2019. Country experts rated the extent to which governments justify their rule based onperformance, the person of the leader, rational-legal procedures, and ideology. They were also asked to qualify the ideology of the regime. The main purposes of this paper are to present the conceptual basis for the measure, describe the data, and provide convergent, content, and construct validity tests for new measures. Our measure of regime legitimation performs well in all these three validation tests, most notably, the construct validity exercise which explores commonly held beliefs about leadership under populist rule.
Databáze: OpenAIRE