Intercanine distance and bite marks analysis using metric method
| Autor: | Shahnavaz Manipady, Pratik Vijay Tarvadi, Mahabalesh Shetty |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Orthodontics
Engineering drawing lcsh:R5-920 Health (social science) Bite mark Dentition Bite marks Intercanine distance Microsoft excel 030206 dentistry Dental cast method Sexual crimes Pathology and Forensic Medicine 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Significant error lcsh:K1-7720 Metric (mathematics) lcsh:Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence 030216 legal & forensic medicine lcsh:Medicine (General) Law True positive rate Mathematics Metric analysis |
| Zdroj: | Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 445-448 (2016) |
| ISSN: | 2090-536X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejfs.2016.11.001 |
| Popis: | Aim Reliability of intercanine distance while analysing bite mark using metric method. Materials and methods Impressions of both, maxillary as well as mandibular arches of 50 consenting volunteers were taken and dentition casts were prepared. The bite mark impression and the dentine measurements were compared using Microsoft Excel Software. Each parameter of the bite mark is compared to the similar parameter in the dentition of the volunteer. The relation of all parameters with intercanine distance was observed. Results The findings resulted in 14 true positives, and considering only intercanine distance as parameter resulted in only 6 true positives. Observations showed a significant error of 72 and 88% respectively. Conclusion We conclude that using intercanine distance as a parameter for bite mark analysis is an unreliable method. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|