Family medicine practice performance and knowledge management
| Autor: | Claire R. McInerney, Alfred F. Tallia, Davida Scharf, Benjamin F. Crabtree, A. John Orzano |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2007 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Knowledge management Leadership and Management Process (engineering) Strategy and Management Comparative case Interprofessional Relations Interviews as Topic Professional Competence Practice Management Medical Medicine Humans Quality of Health Care business.industry Information Dissemination Health Policy Electronic medical record Fieldnotes United States Knowledge Work (electrical) Action (philosophy) Family medicine Models Organizational Sustainability business Family Practice Coding (social sciences) Total Quality Management |
| Zdroj: | Health care management review. 33(1) |
| ISSN: | 0361-6274 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Knowledge management (KM) is the process by which people in organizations find, share, and develop knowledge for action. KM affects performance by influencing work relationships to enhance learning and decision making. PURPOSE To identify how family medicine practices exhibit KM. METHODOLOGY A model and a template of KM concepts were derived from a comprehensive organizational literature review. Two higher and two lower performing family medicine practices were purposefully selected from existing comparative case studies based on prevention delivery rates and innovation. Interviews, fieldnotes of operations, and clinical encounters were coded independently using the template. Face-to-face discussions resolved coding differences. FINDINGS All practices had processes and tools for finding, sharing, and developing knowledge; however, KM overall was limited despite implementation of expensive technologies like an electronic medical record. Where present, KM processes and tools were used by individuals but not integrated throughout the organization. Loss of information was prominent, and finding knowledge was underdeveloped. The use of technical tools and developing knowledge by reconfiguration and measurement were particularly limited. Socially related tools, such as face-to-face-communication for sharing and developing knowledge, were more developed. As in other organizations, tool use was tailored for specific outcomes and leveraged by other organizational capacities. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Differences in KM occur within family practices and between family practices and other organizations and may have implications for improving practice performance. Understanding interaction patterns of work relationships and KM may explain why costly technical or externally imposed "one size fits all" practice organizational interventions have had mixed results and limited sustainability. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|