Clinical Application of Ultrasound Guidance for Parametrial Treatment of Advanced Cervical Cancer
Autor: | Dengke Teng, Dan Shi, Guanghui Cheng, Yuanqiang Lin, Hui Wang, Zhipeng Zhao, Hequn Li, Zhuang Mao |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Intraclass correlation medicine.medical_treatment Brachytherapy Uterine Cervical Neoplasms 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Cervix Ultrasonography Interventional Aged Cervical cancer 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Radiological and Ultrasound Technology medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Parametrial Uterus Ultrasound Reproducibility of Results Magnetic resonance imaging Middle Aged medicine.disease Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound guidance Treatment Outcome medicine.anatomical_structure Female business Nuclear medicine |
Zdroj: | Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 39:1087-1095 |
ISSN: | 1550-9613 0278-4297 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jum.15189 |
Popis: | OBJECTIVES To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (US) in determining the positions of parametrial implants by comparing US with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for advanced cervical cancer. METHODS Patients undergoing brachytherapy with parametrial implantation for cervical cancer from February 2017 to February 2019 were involved in the study. The transverse section of the cervix (surface S1 ) and the transverse section 1 cm above the external cervix (surface S2 ) were selected from MRI and US images as the observation planes. In the MRI observation plane, the distances between the uterine titanium needles and the uterine tube/implanter were set as M1 to M4 ; in the US observation plane, the distances between the uterine titanium needles and the uterine tube/implanter were set as D1 to D4 . The differences and consistency in M and D of each group were then compared. RESULTS There were no significant differences between M and D in each group (P = .058; P = .821; P = .870; and P = .936, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficients of M and D in each group were 0.970, 0.968, 0.952, and 0.956. A regression analysis showed that the relationships between M and D in each group were as follows: M1 = 0.9449D1 + 0.1812; M2 = 0.9463D2 + 0.0965; M3 = 0.9176D3 + 0.1233; and M4 = 0.9253D4 + 0.1224. CONCLUSIONS In parametrial brachytherapy for cervical cancer, US can accurately determine the positions of parametrial implantation needles, which is already applicable on MRI, and can provide assistance in parametrial brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |