Analysis of decision making at a multidisciplinary head and neck tumor board incorporating evidence-based National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines

Autor: Muhammad M. Qureshi, Timothy P. Cooley, Bhartesh A. Shah, Osamu Sakai, Gregory A. Grillone, Scharukh Jalisi, Andrew Salama, Minh Tam Truong, Ken S. Zaner
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Zdroj: Practical radiation oncology. 6(4)
ISSN: 1879-8519
Popis: Purpose To evaluate incorporation of National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines in decision making at a head and neck cancer (HNC) multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) at an urban academic medical center. Methods and materials A retrospective study of 176 HNC patients was performed. The extent to which MDT decisions and subsequent patient care incorporate NCCN guidelines was evaluated. Results A total of 173 (98.3%) HNC patients received MDT recommendations according to NCCN guidelines. Of the 159 patients treated, 153 (96.2%) received treatment according to NCCN guidelines. The MDT recommended the highest available evidence-based NCCN category guideline in 78.0%. Subsequent treatment using the same or higher category MDT recommendation occurred in 87.0% of patients. Conclusions Evaluation of patients at an MDT using NCCN guidelines incorporates the highest level of evidence in approximately 80% of patients and translates well into subsequent care. Incorporation of the highest available NCCN guideline may be improved, although management should be individualized.
Databáze: OpenAIRE