Coronary and Structural Heart Disease Interventions During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Road Map for Clinicians and Health Care Delivery Systems
Autor: | Kishore J. Harjai, Deepak Singh, Terry D. Bauch, Nicholas Ierovante, Alfred S. Casale, Pugazhendi Vijayaraman, Gregory Yost, Thomas D. Scott, James C. Blankenship, Martin E Matsumura, Vernon Mascarenhas, Sandy M. Green, Michael D Harostock, Joseph J. Stella, Mark Bernardi, Shikhar Agarwal, Yassir Nawaz |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Heart Diseases Cath lab Heart disease medicine.medical_treatment Pneumonia Viral Psychological intervention Referring Physician Comorbidity 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Article Betacoronavirus 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Structural Pandemic medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Road map Cardiac Surgical Procedures Pandemics COVID SARS-CoV-2 business.industry COVID-19 Percutaneous coronary intervention General Medicine medicine.disease Emergency medicine Female Coronavirus Infections Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Delivery of Health Care |
Zdroj: | Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine |
ISSN: | 1553-8389 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.06.013 |
Popis: | Background Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, cath labs have had to modify their workflow for elective and urgent patients. Methods We surveyed 16 physicians across 3 hospitals in our healthcare system to address COVID-19 related concerns in the management of interventional and structural heart disease patients, and to formulate system wide criteria for deferring cases till after the pandemic. Results Our survey yielded common concerns centered on the need to protect patients, cath lab staff and physicians from unnecessary exposure to COVID-19; for COVID-19 testing prior to arrival to the cath lab; for clear communication between the referring physician and the interventionalist; but there was initial uncertainty among physicians regarding the optimal management of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytics). Patients with stable angina and hemodynamically stable acute coronary syndromes were deemed suitable for initial medical management, except when they had large ischemic burden. Most transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI) were felt appropriate for postponement except in symptomatic patients with aortic valve area Highlights • During the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiologists’ common concerns centered on the need to protect patients, cath lab staff and physicians from unnecessary exposure to COVID-19; for COVID-19 testing prior to arrival to the cath lab; for clear communication between the referring physician and the interventionalist. • In our survey of interventional cardiologists, primary PCI, rather than lytic therapy, was the preferred method for treating patients presenting with STEMI. • Patients with stable angina and hemodynamically stable acute coronary syndromes were deemed suitable for initial medical management, except when they had large ischemic burden. • Most transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI) were felt appropriate for postponement except in symptomatic patients with aortic valve area < 0.5 cm2 or those with recent hospitalization for heart failure (HF). • Most percutaneous mitral valve repair (pMVR) procedures were felt appropriate for postponement except in patients with HF. All left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and patent foramen ovale (PFO)/atrial septal defect (ASD) closure procedures were felt appropriate for postponement. • Most follow-up visits after structural heart intervention were deemed appropriate for telemedicine rather than in-person visits. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |