EEG reactivity testing for prediction of good outcome in patients after cardiac arrest

Autor: Anne Fleur van Rootselaar, C. R. van Kaam, Hanneke M. Keijzer, Cornelia W. E. Hoedemaekers, Marcus J. Schultz, Michel J.A.M. van Putten, Marjolein M. Admiraal, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Janneke Horn
Přispěvatelé: Clinical Neurophysiology, Intensive Care Medicine, ANS - Brain Imaging, Neurology, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, ACS - Pulmonary hypertension & thrombosis, ACS - Microcirculation
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Sternum
medicine.drug_class
Other Research Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 0]
Electroencephalography
Sensitivity and Specificity
240 Systems Neurology
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
Physical Stimulation
Post-hoc analysis
medicine
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
In patient
Prospective Studies
Good outcome
Prospective cohort study
Hospitals
Teaching

Aged
Monitoring
Physiologic

Netherlands
Academic Medical Centers
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Other Research Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 0]
22/2 OA procedure
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
Cognitive artificial intelligence
Middle Aged
Disorders of movement Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 3]
Prognosis
Confidence interval
Heart Arrest
Analgesics
Opioid

Treatment Outcome
Withholding Treatment
Sedative
Diagnostic odds ratio
Cardiology
Brain Damage
Chronic

Female
Neurology (clinical)
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Zdroj: Neurology, 95, e653-e661
Neurology, 95(6), e653-e661. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Neurology, 95, 6, pp. e653-e661
Neurology, 95(6), e653-e661. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
ISSN: 0028-3878
Popis: ObjectiveTo determine the additional value of EEG reactivity (EEG-R) testing to EEG background pattern for prediction of good outcome in adult patients after cardiac arrest (CA).MethodsIn this post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study, EEG-R was tested twice a day, using a strict protocol. Good outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1–2 within 6 months. The additional value of EEG-R per EEG background pattern was evaluated using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Prognostic value (sensitivity and specificity) of EEG-R was investigated in relation to time after CA, sedative medication, different stimuli, and repeated testing.ResultsBetween 12 and 24 hours after CA, data of 108 patients were available. Patients with a continuous (n = 64) or discontinuous (n = 19) normal voltage background pattern with reactivity were 3 and 8 times more likely to have a good outcome than without reactivity (continuous: DOR, 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–12.0; p = 0.06; discontinuous: DOR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.0–63.97; p = 0.0499). EEG-R was not observed in other background patterns within 24 hours after CA. In 119 patients with a normal voltage EEG background pattern, continuous or discontinuous, any time after CA, prognostic value was highest in sedated patients (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 59.5%), irrespective of time after CA. EEG-R induced by handclapping and sternal rubbing, especially when combined, had highest prognostic value. Repeated EEG-R testing increased prognostic value.ConclusionEEG-R has additional value for prediction of good outcome in patients with discontinuous normal voltage EEG background pattern and possibly with continuous normal voltage. The best stimuli were clapping and sternal rubbing.
Databáze: OpenAIRE