Google Glass Video Capture of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Events: A Pilot Simulation Study
| Autor: | C. Jessica Dine, William D. Schweickert, Stacey M. Kassutto, Meeta Prasad Kerlin, Joshua B. Kayser, Mark T. Upton, Andrew J. Epstein, Gregg Lipschik |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Resuscitation
medicine.medical_treatment Video Recording Video camera Pilot Projects Manikins law.invention Simulation training 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine law Medicine Educational Innovation Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Simulation Training Video recording Philadelphia Inpatients business.industry Video capture Direct observation Internship and Residency 030208 emergency & critical care medicine General Medicine medicine.disease Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Heart Arrest Eyeglasses Observational study Medical emergency Clinical Competence business |
| Popis: | Background Video recording of resuscitation from fixed camera locations has been used to assess adherence to guidelines and provide feedback on performance. However, inpatient cardiac arrests often happen in unpredictable locations and crowded rooms, making video recording of these events problematic. Objective We sought to understand the feasibility of Google Glass (GG) as a method for recording inpatient cardiac arrests and capturing salient resuscitation factors for post-event review. Methods This observational study involved recording simulated cardiac arrest events on inpatient medical wards. Each simulation was reviewed by 3 methods: in-room physician direct observation, stationary video camera (SVC), and GG. Nurse and physician specialists analyzed the videos for global visibility and audibility, as well as recording quality of predefined resuscitation events and behaviors. Resident code leaders were surveyed regarding attitudes toward GG use in the clinical emergency setting. Results Of 11 simulated cardiac arrest events, 9 were successfully recorded by all observation methods (1 GG failure, 1 SVC failure). GG was judged slightly better than SVC recording for average global visualization (3.95 versus 3.15, P = .0003) and average global audibility (4.77 versus 4.42, P = .002). Of the GG videos, 19% had limitations in overall interpretability compared with 35% of SVC recordings (P = .039). All 10 survey respondents agreed that GG was easy to use; however, 2 found it distracting and 3 were uncomfortable with future use during actual resuscitations. Conclusions GG is a feasible and acceptable method for capturing simulated resuscitation events in the inpatient setting. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|