A Novel Assessment Tool for Impulsive Aggression in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Autor: | Azmi Nasser, Gianpiera Ceresoli-Borroni, Steve Hwang, Stefan Schwabe, Daniel F. Connor, Shawn A. Candler, Adelaide S. Robb, Scott Brittain, Robert L. Findling, Christopher J. Evans, Tesfaye Liranso |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
psychometrics
Male Parents Psychometrics Validity Poison control attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Suicide prevention behavioral disciplines and activities Occupational safety and health 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Surveys and Questionnaires Injury prevention medicine Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Humans Pharmacology (medical) Child impulsive aggression diary Retrospective Studies Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Aggression aggression Reproducibility of Results Original Articles medicine.disease 030227 psychiatry Psychiatry and Mental health Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Impulsive Behavior assessment tool Female medicine.symptom Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Clinical psychology |
Zdroj: | Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology |
ISSN: | 1557-8992 1044-5463 |
Popis: | Objective: To establish the validity and reliability of a provisional 30-item impulsive aggression (IA) diary in children (ages 6–12 years, inclusive) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: The provisional 30-item IA diary was administered for 14 days to parents of children with ADHD and IA symptoms (n = 103). Key inclusion criteria: confirmed ADHD diagnosis; signs of IA as measured by a Retrospective-Modified Overt Aggression Scale (R-MOAS) score ≥20 and an Aggression Questionnaire score of −2 to −5. Analyses included inter-item correlations, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), item response theory (IRT) modeling, internal consistency, test–retest reliability (TRT), concurrent validity (estimated by correlation between the IA diary and the R-MOAS/Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form), and known-groups methods. Results: The prevalence rates of 15 (50.0%) items were found to be too low ( |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |