The reporting checklist for public versions of guidelines: RIGHT-PVG
| Autor: | Xiaoqin Wang, Madelin Siedler, Myeong Soo Lee, Sarah L Barber, Joey S W Kwong, Amir Qaseem, Susan L Norris, Ana Marušić, Yaolong Chen, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Ružica Tokalić, Qi Zhou, Akiko Okumura, Janne Estill, Mingming Zhang, Edwin Chan, Kehu Yang, Elie A. Akl |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Research Report
Consensus Delphi Technique Reporting quality Health Informatics Guideline Health informatics Health administration Medicine Humans Health policy ddc:613 computer.programming_language Medical education lcsh:R5-920 business.industry Health Policy Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Health services research Methodology General Medicine Checklist Public or patient version of guidelines Reporting checklist Public or patient version of guidelines (PVG) business lcsh:Medicine (General) computer Delphi Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | Implementation Science : IS Implementation Science, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021) Implementation science, Vol. 16, No 1 (2021) P. 10 |
| ISSN: | 1748-5908 |
| Popis: | Background Public or patient versions of guidelines (PVGs) are derivative documents that “translate” recommendations and their rationale from clinical guidelines for health professionals into a more easily understandable and usable format for patients and the public. PVGs from different groups and organizations vary considerably in terms of quality of their reporting. In order to address this issue, we aimed to develop a reporting checklist for developers of PVGs and other potential users. Methods First, we collected a list of potential items through reviewing a sample of PVGs, existing guidance for developing and reporting PVGs or other similar evidence-based patient tools, as well as qualitative studies on original studies of patients’ needs about the content and/or reporting of information in PVGs or similar evidence-based patient tools. Second, we conducted a two-round Delphi consultation to determine the level of consensus on the items to be included in the final reporting checklist. Third, we invited two external reviewers to provide comments on the checklist. Results We generated the initial list of 45 reporting items based on a review of a sample of 30 PVGs, four PVG guidance documents, and 46 relevant studies. After the two-round Delphi consultation, we formed a checklist of 17 items grouped under 12 topics for reporting PVGs. Conclusion The RIGHT-PVG reporting checklist provides an international consensus on the important criteria for reporting PVGs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink