Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?
Autor: | Ibrahim Al-Ghamdi, Shiva Jayaraman, Firas El-Deen, Douglas Quan, Christopher M. Schlachta |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2009 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors Robot assistance Swine Bench model Efficiency Anastomosis medicine Animals Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Extrahepatic Bile Ducts Laparoscopy medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Anastomosis Surgical Robotics Surgical procedures Surgery surgical procedures operative Liver Choledochostomy Completion time business human activities Abdominal surgery |
Zdroj: | Surgical Endoscopy. 24:584-588 |
ISSN: | 1432-2218 0930-2794 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-009-0621-1 |
Popis: | We used a model of biliary-enteric anastomosis to test whether da Vinci robotics improves performance on a complex minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedure. An ex vivo model for choledochojejunostomy was created using porcine livers with extrahepatic bile ducts and contiguous intestines. MIS choledochojejunostomies were performed in two arms: group 1 (laparoscopic, n = 30) and group 2 (da Vinci assisted, n = 30). Procedures were performed by three surgeons with graduated MIS expertise: surgeon A (MIS + robotics), surgeon B (experienced MIS), and surgeon C (basic MIS). Each surgeon performed ten procedures per group. The primary objective was time to complete anastomoses using each method. Secondary objectives included anastomosis quality, impact of experience on performance, and learning curve. da Vinci led to faster anastomoses than laparoscopy (28.0 vs. 35.9 min, p = 0.002). Surgeon A’s mean operative times were equivalent with both techniques (24.5 vs. 22.3 min). Surgeons B and C experienced faster operative times with robotics over laparoscopy alone (39.4 vs. 28.6 min, p = 0.01; and 43.8 vs. 33.0 min, p = 0.008, respectively). Surgeon A did not demonstrate a learning curve with either laparoscopy (22.4 vs. 22.4 min, p = not significant, NS) or robotics (24.7 vs. 19.8 min, p = NS). Surgeon B demonstrated nonsignificant improvement with laparoscopy (46.6 vs. 39.5 min, p = NS). With robotic assistance, a learning curve was demonstrated (36.8 vs. 24.7 min, p = 0.02). Surgeon C demonstrated a learning curve with laparoscopy (58.3 vs. 33.2 min, p = 0.004), but no improvement was noted with robot assistance (32.2 vs. 34.7 min, p = NS). da Vinci improves time to completion and quality of choledochojejunostomy over laparoscopy in an ex vivo bench model. This advantage is more pronounced in the hands of surgeons with less MIS experience. Conversely, robotics may allow less experienced surgeons to perform more complex operations without first developing advanced laparoscopic skills; however, there may be benefit to first obtaining fundamental skills. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |