A Comparative Study of Large-scale Variants of CMA-ES

Autor: Yann Semet, Rami Kassab, Frédéric Barbaresco, Dimo Brockhoff, Konstantinos Varelas, Nikolaus Hansen, Anne Auger, Ouassim Ait ElHara
Přispěvatelé: Randomized Optimisation (RANDOPT ), Centre de Mathématiques Appliquées - Ecole Polytechnique (CMAP), École polytechnique (X)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Inria Saclay - Ile de France, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria), Université de Technologie de Compiègne (UTC), Sondra, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay (COmUE) (SONDRA), ONERA-CentraleSupélec-Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), Thales Air Systems, Thales Group [France], THALES [France]
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: PPSN XV 2018-15th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
PPSN XV 2018-15th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Sep 2018, Coimbra, Portugal. pp.3-15, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-99253-2_1⟩
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XV ISBN: 9783319992525
PPSN (1)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99253-2_1⟩
Popis: International audience; The CMA-ES is one of the most powerful stochastic numerical optimizers to address difficult black-box problems. Its intrinsic time and space complexity is quadratic-limiting its applicability with increasing problem dimensionality. To circumvent this limitation, different large-scale variants of CMA-ES with subquadratic complexity have been proposed over the past ten years. To-date however, these variants have been tested and compared only in rather restrictive settings, due to the lack of a comprehensive large-scale testbed to assess their performance. In this context, we introduce a new large-scale testbed with dimension up to 640, implemented within the COCO benchmarking platform. We use this testbed to assess the performance of several promising variants of CMA-ES and the standard limited-memory L-BFGS. In all tested dimensions, the best CMA-ES variant solves more problems than L-BFGS for larger budgets while L-BFGS outperforms the best CMA-ES variant for smaller budgets. However, over all functions, the cumulative runtime distributions between L-BFGS and the best CMA-ES variants are close (less than a factor of 4 in high dimension). Our results illustrate different scaling behaviors of the methods, expose a few defects of the algorithms and reveal that for dimension larger than 80, LM-CMA solves more problems than VkD-CMA while in the cumulative runtime distribution over all functions the VkD-CMA dominates or shows almost equal success rate with LM-CMA for budgets up to 10 4 times dimension and for all budgets up to dimension 80.
Databáze: OpenAIRE