Comparing Two Approaches for Thyroidectomy: A Health Technology Assessment through DMAIC Cycle

Autor: Carlo Ricciardi, Adelmo Gubitosi, Donatella Vecchione, Giuseppe Cesarelli, Francesco De Nola, Roberto Ruggiero, Ludovico Docimo, Giovanni Improta
Přispěvatelé: Ricciardi, C., Gubitosi, A., Vecchione, D., Cesarelli, G., De Nola, F., Ruggiero, R., Docimo, L., Improta, G.
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Healthcare, Vol 10, Iss 124, p 124 (2022)
Healthcare
Healthcare; Volume 10; Issue 1; Pages: 124
ISSN: 2227-9032
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010124
Popis: Total thyroidectomy is very common in endocrine surgery and the haemostasis can be obtained in different ways across surgery; recently, some devices have been developed to support this surgical phase. In this paper, a health technology assessment is conducted through the define, measure, analyse, improve, and control cycle of the Six Sigma methodology to compare traditional total thyroidectomy with the surgical operation performed through a new device in an overall population of 104 patients. Length of hospital stay, drain output, and time for surgery were considered the critical to qualities in order to compare the surgical approaches which can be considered equal regarding the organizational, ethical, and security impact. Statistical tests (Kolmogorov–Smirnov, t test, ANOVA, Mann–Whitney, and Kruskal–Wallis tests) and visual management diagrams were employed to compare the approaches, but no statistically significant difference was found between them. Considering these results, this study shows that the introduction of the device to perform total thyroidectomy does not guarantee appreciable clinical advantages. A cost analysis to quantify the economic impact of the device into the practice could be a future development. Healthy policy leaders and clinicians who are requested to make decisions regarding the supply of biomedical technologies could benefit from this research.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: