The Suggested Unique Association Between the Various Statin Subgroups and Prostate Cancer
Autor: | Shabbir M.H. Alibhai, Christopher J.D. Wallis, Thenappan Chandrasekar, Hanan Goldberg, Refik Saskin, Rashid K. Sayyid, Zachary Klaassen, Neil Fleshner, Olli Saarela, Linda Z. Penn, Ardalan E. Ahmad, Miran Kenk, Girish S. Kulkarni, Faizan K. Mohsin, Alejandro Berlin |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Statin Prostate biopsy medicine.drug_class Urology Population 030232 urology & nephrology Lower risk Cohort Studies 03 medical and health sciences Prostate cancer 0302 clinical medicine Interquartile range Internal medicine medicine Humans Rosuvastatin education Retrospective Studies education.field_of_study medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Prostate Prostatic Neoplasms medicine.disease 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors business Pravastatin medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | European urology focus. 7(3) |
ISSN: | 2405-4569 |
Popis: | Background The chemopreventive effect of various medications in prostate cancer (PCa) has gained interest. Specifically, the potential impact of statins on PCa incidence has been studied, but solely as a “drug family” overlooking the distinctive pharmacological properties of its two main subgroups: hydrophilic and hydrophobic statins. Objective To assess the impact of statin subgroups on PCa-specific mortality (PCSM), PCa diagnosis, and undergoing another prostate biopsy. Design, setting, and participants This is a population-based cohort study in Ontario identifying all men aged ≥66 yr with a history of a single negative prostate biopsy (representing healthy men at risk for PCa) between 1994 and 2016, who were not on any of the analyzed medications prior to the study, with a median follow-up of 9.42 yr (interquartile range 8.03 yr). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Using multivariable cause-specific hazard models with time-dependent covariates, the association of hydrophobic and hydrophilic statins with all study outcomes was analyzed. Other putative chemopreventive medications (including alpha-blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, and proton-pump inhibitors), age, rurality, comorbidities, and study inclusion year were included in the models. Results and limitations Overall, 21 512 men were identified. Statins were taken by 11 401 patients (50.3%), 5184 men (24.1%) were diagnosed with PCa, and 805 (3.7%) died from it. Overall, 7556 patients (35.1%) underwent another biopsy. Any use of hydrophilic statins was associated with a 32.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9–47.5%), a 20% (95% CI 10–28%), and an 18% (95% CI 6.1–27.3%) decreased risk of PCSM, undergoing another prostate biopsy, and being diagnosed with PCa, respectively. Hydrophobic statins were associated with 17% (95% CI 2–31%) decreased PCSM. The study is limited by its retrospective nature, selection bias, and accompanying health-administrative database inaccuracies. Conclusions Use of any statin may be associated with a lower hazard of PCSM, with hydrophilic statins showing a greater association with decreased PCa diagnosis rates. Preferentially prescribing one statin subgroup over another in men needs further exploration. Patient summary Use of any statin may be associated with a lower probability of dying from prostate cancer. Hydrophilic statins (rosuvastatin and pravastatin) may also be more positively associated with a lower risk of undergoing an additional prostate biopsy and being diagnosed with prostate cancer in men aged ≥66 yr. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |