Gradual or abrupt? The phonetic path to morphologisation
| Autor: | Patrycja Strycharczuk, James M. Scobbie |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Sound change
Linguistics and Language Speech recognition 05 social sciences British English Contrast (music) 050105 experimental psychology Language and Linguistics Allophone language.human_language Linguistics Focus (linguistics) 030507 speech-language pathology & audiology 03 medical and health sciences Speech and Hearing Morpheme Vowel language 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences 0305 other medical science Categorical variable Mathematics |
| Zdroj: | Strycharczuk, P & Scobbie, J 2016, ' Gradual or abrupt? The phonetic path to morphologisation ', Journal of Phonetics, vol. 59, pp. 76-91 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.003 |
| ISSN: | 0095-4470 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.003 |
| Popis: | While some sound changes occur in environments defined in purely phonological terms, others may become sensitive to morphological boundaries. In this paper, we investigate the phonetic nature of this latter diachronic development: does it happen through small gradient increments, or is there a categorical shift from one allophone to another? We focus on GOOSE-fronting and /l/-darkening in Southern British English, the interaction of which is sensitive to morphological boundaries. Relatively retracted realisations of the vowel and dark realisations of the /l/ appear before a morpheme boundary, even when a vowel follows (e.g. fool-ing), whereas in monomorphemic words (e.g. hula), there is more /u:/-fronting, and the /l/ is relatively lighter. We analyse the phonetic realisation of such pairs as hula vs. fool-ing in 20 speakers of Southern British English using both acoustic and articulatory (ultrasound) instrumental methods. All the speakers express the morphological contrast in some way, although effect sizes vary dramatically. For some speakers, the contrast involves subtle articulatory differences without any clear acoustic consequences, whereas other speakers show robust differences employing multiple phonetic correlates. We therefore argue that the hula~fool-ing contrast would be misrepresented if analysed in terms of a small number of either /u:/ or /l/ allophonic categories. Instead, we interpret the results as supporting the predictions of phonological frameworks that incorporate phonetically gradient morphologisation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect