Quality of Recovery Following Orthopedic Surgery in Patients at an Academic Hospital in South Africa
Autor: | Helen Perrie, Juan Scribante, Erica Wessels, Zainub Jooma |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors medicine.drug_class Risk Assessment Hospitals University South Africa 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Risk Factors 030202 anesthesiology medicine Humans Severe pain Antiemetic Orthopedic Procedures In patient Patient Reported Outcome Measures Quality Indicators Health Care Pain Postoperative business.industry Recovery of Function Perioperative Middle Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Treatment Outcome Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine medicine.anatomical_structure Elective Surgical Procedures Anesthesia Orthopedic surgery Anesthetic Female Ankle business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Foot (unit) medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Anesthesia & Analgesia. 133:507-514 |
ISSN: | 0003-2999 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND Measurement of perioperative quality of recovery (QoR) is an important tool in improving the patient's perioperative experience. By making use of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, this study aimed to measure the QoR on day 1 in patients following elective and semiurgent orthopedic surgery at an academic hospital. A secondary aim was to determine factors that may influence the QoR. METHODS A cross-sectional research study was performed in 122 patients presenting for elective and semiurgent orthopedic surgery during core working hours between July and November 2019 at Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa. Patients completed a baseline QoR-15 assessment preoperatively and a day 1 QoR-15 assessment between 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Additional information on various anesthetic, surgical, and patient factors was collected. RESULTS Nineteen patients (15.6%) had a poor QoR on day 1 and were found to have started with a significantly worse baseline QoR-15 score than those with no poor QoR (98.5 vs 128.5; P < .001). A significant worsening from the overall mean baseline QoR-15 to the overall mean day 1 QoR-15 score was found (123.8 vs 113.1; P = .001). This worsening score was more pronounced in patients with a poor day 1 QoR-15 score than no poor day 1 score (25.3 vs 8; P = .002). Surgical site was found to have a significant effect on day 1 score (P = .026). A significantly worse severe pain score was found in patients with foot/ankle and knee surgery compared to hand/arm surgery (P = .012 and P = .032, respectively) and is thought to be due to the decreased use of peripheral nerve blocks in lower limb surgery. Sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, type of anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, and antiemetic given (only applicable in general anesthetic cases) were not found to have a significant effect on the day 1 QoR-15 scores. CONCLUSIONS Patients who had a poor QoR on day 1 started with a significantly worse baseline QoR-15 score and experienced a significantly greater negative change in the mean difference. Preoperative identification of patients who are at risk of a poor postoperative QoR may aid in preemptive targeting of limited resources to those who need them most. Postoperative pain, particularly in patients after foot/ankle and knee surgery, is a significant modifiable factor to improve postoperative QoR at our institution. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |