Intraoral versus extraoral cementation of implant-supported single crowns: Clinical, biomarker, and microbiological comparisons

Autor: Nurcan Buduneli, Muhittin Toman, Begüm Kıran, Nejat Nizam, David F. Lappin, Suna Toksavul
Přispěvatelé: Ege Üniversitesi
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 20:170-179
ISSN: 1523-0899
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12567
Popis: WOS: 000430082400010
PubMed ID: 29210181
ObjectivesImplant supported single metal-ceramic crowns cemented either extraorally or intraorally were comparatively evaluated by clinical, radiologic, biomarker, and microbiological parameters. Materials and MethodsTwelve patients with bilateral single tooth gap in the maxillary posterior region received two locking-taper implants; 4.5 mm width, 8 mm length. Selection of intraoral (IOC) or extraoral cementation (EOC) using screwless titanium abutments was done randomly. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF), gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples were collected from the implants, adjacent teeth, and bleeding on probing, soft tissue thickness, keratinized tissue width were recorded before starting the prosthetic procedures (baseline) and 3, 6 months after implant loading. Crestal bone loss was measured on radiographs taken immediately and 6 months after cementation. Cytokine levels, amounts of bacteria were determined in PICF/GCF samples. Data were tested by appropriate statistical analyses. ResultsClinical findings were similar in the crowns cemented extraorally or intraorally at all times (P
Databáze: OpenAIRE