Does vasopressin improve the mortality of septic shock patients treated with high-dose NA
| Autor: | Satoshi Fukuda, Satoshi Toyama, Makoto Ozaki, Toru Kotani, Yoko Sato, Koichi Ohsugi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Vasopressin
medicine.medical_specialty Surviving Sepsis Campaign noradrenalin vasopressin Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Body weight law.invention Lactate clearance 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine law Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Survival rate business.industry Septic shock 030208 emergency & critical care medicine Retrospective cohort study medicine.disease Intensive care unit Surgery Anesthesia septic shock business Research Article |
| Zdroj: | Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine |
| ISSN: | 1998-359X 0972-5229 |
| Popis: | Aim of Study: In Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2012, noradrenalin (NA) is recommended as a first choice vasopressor. Although vasopressin (VP) is recommended for the treatment of NA-resistant septic shock, the optimal parameters for its administration remain unclear. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the administration of VP to adult septic shock patients who were undergoing high-dose NA (≥0.25 μg/kg/min) therapy in our Intensive Care Unit between January 2010 and December 2013. We defined high-dose NA as a dose of >0.25 μg/kg/min, based on the definition of low-dose NA as a dose of 5-14 μg/min because the average body weight of the patients in this study was 53.0 kg. Results: Among 29 patients who required the administration of high-dose NA, 18 patients received VP. Although the patient background physiological conditions and NA dose did not differ between the two groups, the survival rate of the VP-treated patients was significantly lower (33%) than that of the patients who were managed with a high-dose of NA-alone (82%) ( P = 0.014). The lactate clearance did not change after the administration of VP, whereas it improved when in NA treatment alone. Conclusion: The results suggest that the administration of VP did not improve the mortality among septic shock patients when administered in addition to high-dose NA. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|