Understanding the nature and dimensions of litigation crowdfunding: A visual analytics approach
| Autor: | Jie Ren, Viju Raghupathi, Wullianallur Raghupathi |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Economics
Emotions Social Sciences Fund Raising Intellectual property Research Ethics Voting Medicine and Health Sciences Psychology Healthcare Financing Health Systems Strengthening Research Integrity media_common 050502 law Plaintiff Multidisciplinary Human rights 05 social sciences Health Care Costs Emigration and Immigration Public relations Intellectual Property Crowdsourcing Medicine Public service Commercial Law Philanthropic Funding of Science Research Article Human Rights Social Problems Science Policy media_common.quotation_subject Science Morals Research Funding Economic Justice Social Justice 0502 economics and business Humans 0505 law Health Care Policy business.industry Judicial review Biology and Life Sciences Health Care Philosophy Fees and Charges Law and Legal Sciences business Finance 050203 business & management |
| Zdroj: | PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 4, p e0250522 (2021) PLoS ONE |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
| Popis: | The escalating cost of civil litigation is leaving many defendants and plaintiffs unable to meet legal expenses such as attorney fees, court charges and others. This significantly impacts their ability to sue or defend themselves effectively. Related to this phenomenon is the ethics discussion around access to justice and crowdfunding. This article explores the dimensions that explain the phenomenon of litigation crowdfunding. Using data from CrowdJustice, a popular Internet fundraising platform used to assist in turning legal cases into publicly funded social cases, we study litigation crowdfunding through the lenses of the number of pledges, goal achievement, target amount, length of description, country, case category, and others. Overall, we see a higher number of cases seeking funding in the categories of human rights, environment, and judicial review. Meanwhile, the platform offers access to funding for other less prominent categories, such as voting rights, personal injury, intellectual property, and data & privacy. At the same time, donors are willing to donate more to cases related to health, politics, and public services. Also noteworthy is that while donors are willing to donate to education, animal welfare, data & privacy, and inquest-related cases, they are not willing to donate large sums to these causes. In terms of lawyer/law firm status, donors are more willing to donate to cases assisted by experienced lawyers. Furthermore, we also note that the higher the number of successful cases an attorney presents, the greater the amount raised. We analyzed valence, arousal, and dominance in case description and found they have a positive relationship with funds raised. Also, when a case description is updated on a crowdsourcing site, it ends up being more successful in funding—at least in the categories of health, immigration, and judicial review. This is not the case, however, for categories such as public service, human rights, and environment. Our research addresses whether litigation crowdfunding, in particular, levels the playing field in terms of opening up financing opportunities for those individuals who cannot afford the costs of litigation. While it may support social justice, ethical concerns with regards to the kinds of campaigns must also be addressed. Most of the ethical concerns center around issues relating to both the fundraisers and donors. Our findings have ethical and social justice implications for crowdfunding platform design. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|