What happens after early intervention in first-episode psychosis? Limitations of existing service models and an agenda for the future
| Autor: | Andrew S, Hyatt, Victoria, Hasler, Emily K, Wilner |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 35:165-170 |
| ISSN: | 1473-6578 0951-7367 |
| Popis: | Early intervention in first-episode psychosis (FEP) improves symptomatic and functional outcomes while programs last. However, these gains may not be sustained over time and not all individuals benefit equally from such programs. This review examines the efficacy of FEP programs, as well as step-down practices and long-term outcomes to identify ways to extend the gains made in FEP programs.FEP programs improve outcomes while services last, but effects diminish over time. Step-down and discharge practices vary widely with little randomized evidence guiding practice. Extending the duration of FEP programs for all does not consistently improve outcomes, but there is some encouraging evidence that targeted psychosocial interventions after program end may extend symptomatic and functional benefits. Members of marginalized groups and individuals with poorer outcomes during the FEP period may benefit from further specialized intervention after FEP.Step down practices from FEP programs should be structured and tailored to individual needs, and benefit from sustained connections to community resources. Psychosocial interventions like social skills training, peer support, and supported education and employment may help extend the benefit of FEP programs after more intensive services end. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|