Use and coverage of automated external defibrillators according to location in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Autor: | Henrik Schakow, Jonas Junghans Jensen, Simon Michael Starck, Oke Gerke, Finn Lund Henriksen, Gitte Jørgensen, Jacob E. Møller, Hans Mickley, Laura Sarkisian |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Emergency Medical Services
Coverage Defibrillation Electric Countershock 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Emergency Nursing Environment Automated external Ambulatory Care Facilities Out of hospital cardiac arrest Defibrillator 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine AED External defibrillators medicine Humans Mixed group Recreation Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest business.industry Sports facility 030208 emergency & critical care medicine Bystander medicine.disease Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Nursing Homes OHCA Emergency Medicine Medical emergency Health clinic Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Nursing homes business Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Defibrillators |
Zdroj: | Sarkisian, L, Mickley, H, Schakow, H, Gerke, O, Starck, S M, Jensen, J J, Møller, J E, Jørgensen, G & Henriksen, F L 2021, ' Use and Coverage of Automated External Defibrillators According to Location in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest ', Resuscitation, vol. 162, pp. 112-119 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.040 |
ISSN: | 1873-1570 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.040 |
Popis: | Aims To evaluate 1) the relative use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) at different types of AED locations 2) the percentage of AEDs crossing location types during OHCA before use 3) the AED coverage distance at different types of AED locations, and 4) the 30-day-survival in different subgroups. Methods From 2014–2018, AEDs used by bystanders during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the Region of Southern Denmark were collected. Data regarding registered AEDs was retrieved from the national AED-network. The OHCA site and AED placement was categorized into; 1) Residential; 2) Public; 3) Nursing home, 4) Company/workplace; 5) Institution; 6) Health clinic and 7) Sports facility/recreational. To evaluate 30-day-survival, groups 4–7 were pooled into one Mixed group. Results In total 509 OHCAs were included. There was high relative usage of AEDs from public places, nursing homes, health clinics and sports facilities, and low relative usage from companies/workplaces, residential areas and institutions. Of AEDs used during residential OHCAs 39% were collected from public places. AEDs placed in residential areas and public places had a coverage of 575 m (IQR 130–1300) and 270 m (IQR5-550), respectively. Thirty-day- survival in public, residential and mixed groups were 49%, 14% and 67%, respectively. Conclusion The relative use of AEDs from public places, nursing homes, sports facilities and health clinics was high, and AEDs used during OHCA in residential areas were most frequently collected from public places. AEDs placed in both residential areas and public places may have a wider coverage area than proposed in current literature. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |