Results of the 2003 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) surveys of residents and chief residents in the United States
| Autor: | Vipul V. Thakkar, Mark A. Engleman, Reshma Jagsi, Anurag K. Singh, Daniel F. Flynn, Steven J. Frank, David A. Buck |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2005 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Personnel Staffing and Scheduling Academic practice Psychological intervention Private Practice Sex Factors Nursing Radiation oncology medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Salary Sex Distribution Association (psychology) Response rate (survey) Academic career Chi-Square Distribution Radiation Career Choice business.industry Internship and Residency United States Oncology Private practice Family medicine Radiation Oncology Female business |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 61:642-648 |
| ISSN: | 0360-3016 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.690 |
| Popis: | Purpose To document demographic characteristics of current residents, career motivations and aspirations, and training program policies and resources. Methods In 2003, the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) conducted two nationwide surveys: one of all U.S. radiation oncology residents and one of chief residents. Results The Chief Residents' Survey was completed by representatives from all 77 programs (response rate, 100%). The Residents' Survey was returned by 229 respondents (response rate, 44%). In each, 32% of respondents were female. The most popular career after residency was private practice (46%), followed by permanent academic practice (28%). Changes that would entice those choosing private practice to consider an academic career included more research experience as a resident (76%), higher likelihood of tenure (69%), lesser time commitment (66%), and higher salary (54%). Although the majority of respondents were satisfied with educational experience overall, a number of programs were reported to provide fewer resources than required. Conclusions Median program resources and numbers of outliers are documented to allow residents and program directors to assess the relative adequacy of experience in their own programs. Policy-making bodies and individual programs should consider these results when developing interventions to improve educational experiences of residents and to increase retention of radiation oncologists in academic practice. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|